In Reply to: All the proof I need is obtained through direct observation... posted by Wellfed on June 26, 2006 at 17:48:09:
Observation is just the first step to form your HYPOTHESIS. The next step is to PROVE your hypothesis. So if you're only observing, you can say you have an unproven hypothesis the GSIC works as the claimed, but you (nor anybody else) has proof claim is true.I’m human just like everyone else and make the same human mistakes when expectations interfere with listening judgments. For example, I really believed I (and some friends) was hearing silver interconnects brighter than copper. Later it was shown that nobody could differentiate silver from copper when the same audition was repeated blind.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry, but observation is NOT proof - Caymus 18:24:08 06/26/06 (5)
- In order to appease your delicate sensibilities, allow me to re-phrase then... - Wellfed 19:49:45 06/26/06 (4)
- I don't think you get it yet - Caymus 20:08:58 06/26/06 (3)
- You're starting to scare me... - Wellfed 20:31:53 06/26/06 (2)
- Huh? And you accuse others for infantile responses (nt) - Caymus 21:18:27 06/26/06 (1)
- I was talking about... - Wellfed 22:13:57 06/26/06 (0)