In Reply to: Wonderful! – now THAT’S a classic example of a RED HERRING! posted by Caymus on June 26, 2006 at 14:05:55:
What, in God's good earth, are you talking about?My exchange with the sly Mr Kafton has nothing to do with any position here.
Your use of fallacious arguments is one of the sub-topics in this thread. My query to Pat D was directly relevant to the topic. I wasn't comparing you with Idi Amin, I was comparing you with you.
You got frustrated and threw out a random red herring to start attacking me.
Again, what, in God's good earth, are you talking about? You're not now claiming powers of omniscience, are you?
As usual, you can’t think of any counter argument, so (as usual for you) you always stoop to simply trashing the person you disagree with.
I'd like to see proof for this claim of yours. Who do you think owns the burden here?
I await your characteristically unbecoming reply.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The sly Mr. Kafton?... - Wellfed 20:25:00 06/26/06 (6)
- Unless you’re Virtual Dynamics, keep God out of it! - Caymus 21:07:20 06/26/06 (5)
- It's not your views that I have issue with... - Wellfed 22:08:35 06/26/06 (4)
- Perhaps after seeing the behavior of believers... - real_jj 15:10:18 07/08/06 (2)
- Bigotry by any other name is still bigotry... - Wellfed 16:40:28 07/08/06 (1)
- trVth - real_jj 11:14:11 07/10/06 (0)
- And not just cynics, but *sneering* cynics who moreover have no sensa humor. Caymus to a T! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:25 06/27/06 (0)