In Reply to: Nail on the head dude! posted by dado4 on August 19, 2004 at 21:17:58:
dado4: HTML tag not allowed
That is precisely why one would do many different wires (inductance) vs the different wire types...a solid correlation points towards isolating the variable..yes, there may be confounding variables, but that's why a model is created...to test it...the model here being the metric as defined over at AH...test the model, re-configure it should it not fit..if the ratings their metric (nodel) provides doesn't fit audibility, fix the metric (model).The tact I have taken....I can manufacture a double braid coax with any choice of L or C and R (L and C are locked by the equation L*C=1034 * DC)...R is pre-defined by the braid I choose... I can isolate the variables R, L, and C, and test them out without confounding influences..
That is what it's all about...elimination of the confounding variables.
But, to approach this endeavor without creating a model, albeit an incorrect one????What do you test?? You have to test a model for validity. That is science.
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Nail on the head dude! - jneutron 08:14:31 08/20/04 (0)