In Reply to: There was some content in JR's post. Gonna answer, or continue to sling mud? nt posted by Commuteman on August 25, 2004 at 13:05:40:
Here, I'll copy his entire post..check it for accuracy, Peter...make sure I'm not making this up...First, JR says this:""What nail? I love it, you can't possibly be that dense, it must be an act.""
I suspect you don't consider this to be content...are you expecting me to answer this???
Next: JR says:""
Given Soundmind's consistent failure to address any of commuteman's points, even after having them spelled out several times, his failure to read the post URL's provided, and his bald statements right out of the ABX naysayer handbook:""
Although we may disagree on many things, I think we can both agree that this is not a question....so, do you expect me to answer this??? How??..it's not a question..
He then quotes...
"The burden of proof.... "
"But so far no one has demonstrated that such distortions exist let alone that they are audible."
" .. the subjective effect of frequency response deviation is well documented .. "
".. computers can be programmed to analyze the squiggles that humans can't and to make sense of any differences caused by the addition of a wire into a circuit. "I assume someone's quotes are not actual questions..
So, JR continues:
""It is the usual closed mind, self-certainty, "ignore the points brought up by others" tack he has repeatedly exhibited that makes me strongly suspect that an AR regular naysayer has come looking for fresh meat.Pardon me...is that a question???
Then JR says:
""I think you know who this is, and why he is here. That would make you a party to the trolling that he seems to be engaged in, as well as a sure bet to defend him and promote his agenda. Thus, it is no mystery why you yourself are once again focusing only on certain things, and ignoring others. Bias, agenda, promote a POV that does not include the whole model, all the facts, or all the data. SOS.""Well, Peter???? Where are the questions that you are claiming that I ignored?????
Is it going to be your destiny in life to defend piss poor attitude by obfuscation?
Peter...that was not even a fair attempt at diverting the discussion away from Jon Risch's piss poor crapola...I'd give it a 1.725
Please, if you wish to discuss the reality of his performance....do so..
Or was it just your overwhelming desire to create this hugely fictional subject line to make people think you had some kind of substance behind the statement????
Approval by silence, Peter....approval by silence...
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Lets review the content...and see what there is to answer.. - jneutron 13:37:31 08/25/04 (5)
- Wow, John... - Commuteman 14:14:34 08/25/04 (4)
- Stop with the between the lines stuff. - jneutron 06:52:48 08/26/04 (3)
- Sorry - wont chicken out again on you ;o) nt! - Granholm 06:09:43 08/27/04 (2)
- Well ok.. - Granholm 06:19:54 08/27/04 (1)
- Re: Well ok.. - jneutron 06:49:29 08/27/04 (0)