In Reply to: Dan..JR's garbage is just begging response, so here it is..... posted by jneutron on August 13, 2004 at 06:40:29:
[ At least Gene is open to discussion of the ramifications of cables w/r to sound, and is supporting the upgrading of our understanding via discussion with test equipment vendors.. ]The bottom line is still that no listening was done, not of any kind.
It is ALL based on supposition and prior assumptions without any basis in facts or science.
Regardles of what YOU might think of me or my posts, how do you justify Gene/AH's unscientific approach? It really doesn't matter if he emasures every cable in existence, if all it is used for is to falsely 'validate' a previously assummed POV.
Where are your diatribes against 'garbage science' now?
I think it is plain to see, as long as the psuedo science bashes cables, you are OK with it, let soemone else a yeasayer, post the same kind of thing, and you are all over it to the max. Biased, blind, unwitting response on your part. And you can't even see how uneven your responses are.
Jon Risch
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Garbage science.... - Jon Risch 10:34:41 08/13/04 (6)
- Re: Garbage science.... - john curl 23:13:12 08/13/04 (1)
- Re: Garbage science.... - jneutron 06:52:17 08/16/04 (0)
- Re: Garbage guru - jneutron 10:54:43 08/13/04 (3)
- SOS - Jon Risch 11:23:33 08/14/04 (2)
- You fooled me..I was hoping for some actual technical stuff from you.. - jneutron 06:32:41 08/16/04 (0)