Home DVD-Audiobahn

New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players.

Re: in other words, you had no basis for saying that i had "faulty logic"

68.43.62.64

<< Incorrect. If the same ADC converter is used, both 16-bit and 24-bit versions are decimated from the same sigma-delta modulated stream. any noise and distortion (eg. quantization error) is determined by the sigma-delta modulation and not by the final output format. >>

So if we output to say 8-bits, it's your view that the 8-bit version would be no more noisy than the 24-bit version?

Obviously that can't be right. The format determines the noise if the inherent noise of the format is greater than the noise of the converter.

<< the only difference is the 16-bit version discards any information below 16-bit. >>

Sort of. Unless the converter is broken, it uses dither, not truncation. (Re-)quantization adds noise. It's not a lossless process (this is true even if the converter is perfect). Sampling at 24-bits is less lossy than sampling at 16-bits, assuming the converter is capable of providing better than 16-bit performance.

<< like i said, if you disagree, please provide proof in the form of validated double blind testing results. >>

I'm not the one making subjective claims. You made a statement about the audibility of 16-bit vs. 24-bit, which I did not argue with. I disputed the logic that if the 24-bit version sounds better than the 16-bit version, it must be because the source is somehow superior to 16-bits.



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Parts Connexion  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.