In Reply to: Re: You have to use them before you dismiss them -- thinking about how they work doesn't count! posted by thetubeguy1954 on January 24, 2007 at 10:44:43:
Nah, we didn't care what you heard, or didn't hear, or thought you heard, or thought you didn't hear, or what your wife, mailman, or your dog heard: We just wanted to give you a hard time because you took audio soooooo seriously and your extreme mood swings made for some very interesting "classic" posts, which in a perverse way, we found very entertaining ... just like the reactions a prison guard gets by clanging his steel cup against the steel bars of inmate's cells as he walks by inside a prison. Well I know this is an asylum, not a prison, but if two audiophiles can't bitterly argue about life and death audio issues, such as speaker break-in time, in an asylum, then where else could we go to argue? In public? No we'd look like two old fools!The one fact I know about audio that I will never debate: You have to listen to something before you accurately criticize, or express doubt about, its sound quality. The second fact I know about audio is that any human can listen to a component, declare it sounds wonderful, or it stinks, and be completely wrong about that component.
.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "You guys just never believed me" - Richard BassNut Greene 10:05:50 01/25/07 (2)
- You have to listen...... - Bob Wortman 21:31:13 02/03/07 (0)
- Re: "You guys just never believed me" - thetubeguy1954 13:20:13 01/25/07 (0)