In Reply to: Serious testing posted by KlausR. on January 25, 2007 at 00:13:05:
"When such a device appears one would expect that in a first step some sort of solid, unbiased, repeatable evidence is provided that shows that the devices really works"Why would you expect this Klaus? Its not like they were developed at Bell Laboratories or Siemens.
"The fact that at least one of the cups is active in the audible range does not mean that it has an audible effect"
Of course not and I never said that one implied the other. I simply said that if it resonates in the audible range then it is possible that it does do something to the sound in the room. At least it doesn't rely on bogus quantum arguments or some mysticism.
"The evidence for ultrasonic hearing apparently is suffering from methodological flaws"
WHere is your evidence that such studies were flawed?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Serious testing - morricab 01:56:10 01/25/07 (6)
- Re: Serious testing - KlausR. 04:41:02 01/25/07 (5)
- Re: Serious testing - morricab 04:50:18 01/25/07 (4)
- Re: Serious testing - KlausR. 11:13:48 01/25/07 (3)
- Re: Serious testing - morricab 12:26:00 01/25/07 (2)
- Scientific proof? - KlausR. 00:54:33 01/26/07 (1)
- Re: Scientific proof? - morricab 06:11:45 01/26/07 (0)