In Reply to: Isn't there a contradiction between? posted by Jim Austin on October 22, 2005 at 07:42:48:
If I am going to criticize them, I also need to acknowledge when they've done the right thing.While I've got you here...
You've talked a bit about blind versus double blind. Now those are narrow terms of art to some people, but to most, the meaning is as much a Rorschach test as anything else. I don't think there's any right or wrong here, but in order to discuss things intelligently, we need to define terms. Can you define what you mean by a double blind test?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Nope - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 08:43:07 10/22/05 (17)
- Re: Nope - Jim Austin 09:15:41 10/22/05 (16)
- Re: Yep - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 09:34:14 10/22/05 (15)
- Sounds like... - Jim Austin 12:10:35 10/23/05 (3)
- Another method for keeping tasters honest... - Mark Kelly 19:50:03 10/24/05 (0)
- Is the sense of taste more acute than the sense of hearing? - Dave Pogue 05:35:53 10/24/05 (0)
- Re: Sounds like... - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 21:31:29 10/23/05 (0)
- Now hold on there. - Silver Eared John 12:14:20 10/22/05 (8)
- Did someone say Zin? - mkuller 11:39:21 10/23/05 (4)
- I've liked the "Rodney Strong Twisted Vines" in the past - Silver Eared John 16:54:52 10/24/05 (0)
- Re: Dry Creek - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 21:32:19 10/23/05 (2)
- I have a few late-70s Zins that still hold up. Amazing! - clarkjohnsen 09:34:18 10/24/05 (1)
- Re: I have a few late-70s Zins that still hold up. Amazing! - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:04:45 10/24/05 (0)
- Re: No disagreement - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 16:11:13 10/22/05 (2)
- Hmm, anything I can still buy realistically that you like? - Silver Eared John 18:15:23 10/22/05 (1)
- Re: Hmm, anything I can still buy realistically that you like? - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 18:25:26 10/22/05 (0)
- Hey W.C.... - mkuller 10:26:29 10/22/05 (1)
- Re: Hey W.C.... - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 10:32:59 10/22/05 (0)