In Reply to: I'm waiting for proof! posted by KlausR. on May 12, 2005 at 08:00:57:
"Why do you think that new drugs, wine, audio compression algorithms are DBT-ed?"I can sort of see why for drugs, but not the others, esp. audio.
"I simply don't believe in sighted testing proving anything, that's all and that's why I don't spend my audio money on fancy cables etc."
Don't have opinion on DBT as never use it, have good results with sighted tests, always have.
As for isolation devices, for seismic or other reasons, I did not say that they don't work! I said that I don't believe that I need one.
OK.
"Where's that proof for the wave-particle non-dualism?"
There's no dualism in q-dot, where confinement in all 3 spatial dimensions *prevents* electrons from behaving as particles.
Photons are harder to categorize, it all depends, but i'd say laser light behaves more like waves than particles. As for photons from q-dot , I'm still thinking about it.(Trust me, you would be shocked at results of isolating your turntable.)
G
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - geoffkait 16:30:56 05/12/05 (11)
- Expert opinion about DBT - KlausR. 03:07:30 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: Expert opinion about DBT - geoffkait 03:40:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 01:49:42 05/13/05 (8)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 03:38:09 05/13/05 (7)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 04:08:25 05/13/05 (6)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 05:38:07 05/13/05 (5)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 07:03:39 05/13/05 (4)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 07:23:30 05/13/05 (2)
- Re: The full story - KlausR. 08:07:17 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 11:02:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Homework, due diligence, etc.... - pburant 07:08:58 05/13/05 (0)