In Reply to: Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire posted by geoffkait on May 7, 2005 at 08:49:03:
I didn't call you a liar, I said that I think that you are making (i.e.invent) that story up, at least that's the impression I've got from our ping-pong exchanges, as if you needed my answers/questions to be able to add the following bit to the jigsaw-puzzle. If you had said that you did not know but once you knew you would present the whole story, very fine, but you did not.As far as your statements are concerned, I don't have any doubts about them : they are not plausible. Q-dots emit light, light cannot walk through plastic/metal. I did not do my "homework" w.r.t niobium, that's all. The one expert I asked told me that your story is BS. He's working in semiconductors. There's many technical applications of q-devices, with as many experts, I won't ask them all. Once you tell me what exact technical field I should be looking at, I'll do.
I'm not judging quantum effects, but q-dots are no mystical devices with mystical properties, they are emitting plain and simple light, very well known to physicists. The only quantum thing in this affair is how that light is generated, again, nothing mysterious about that.
Since about 2 months (or more?) you website is mentioning that soon-to-come explanation. Soon is a very flexible and extremely elastic term, how soon is your soon?
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - KlausR. 10:59:57 05/07/05 (67)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - geoffkait 13:20:35 05/07/05 (54)
- We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - KlausR. 22:54:23 05/07/05 (53)
- Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - geoffkait 02:48:52 05/08/05 (52)
- Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - KlausR. 03:42:54 05/08/05 (51)
- Re: "Light is light" - geoffkait 05:10:41 05/08/05 (50)
- No more wave-particle dualism? - KlausR. 06:22:43 05/08/05 (49)
- Re: wave-particle dualism - geoffkait 06:48:11 05/08/05 (48)
- Your TV anecdote - KlausR. 09:07:57 05/08/05 (47)
- Re: CDP laser - geoffkait 09:35:07 05/08/05 (40)
- Re: CDP laser - KlausR. 09:58:27 05/08/05 (39)
- Re: Fatal Flaw - geoffkait 10:52:51 05/08/05 (38)
- Flaw, there's lots of them - KlausR. 11:03:48 05/08/05 (37)
- Re: There's a flaw, allright - geoffkait 11:20:46 05/08/05 (36)
- Flaws there are... - KlausR. 01:47:14 05/09/05 (35)
- Re: Sleepy Time - geoffkait 04:30:56 05/09/05 (34)
- Re: Sleepy Time - KlausR. 05:28:52 05/09/05 (33)
- Re: - geoffkait 06:23:29 05/09/05 (32)
- Photons and CDP - KlausR. 23:10:39 05/09/05 (31)
- Re: Photons and CDP - geoffkait 03:02:05 05/10/05 (30)
- Laser light - KlausR. 03:48:34 05/10/05 (29)
- Re: Laser light - geoffkait 04:52:18 05/10/05 (28)
- Re: Laser light - KlausR. 08:56:45 05/10/05 (27)
- Re: Photons and Metals - geoffkait 18:55:59 05/10/05 (25)
- Re:I call Bullshit - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:16:45 05/19/05 (0)
- Re: - KlausR. 03:07:13 05/11/05 (23)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 05:40:40 05/11/05 (22)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 07:47:14 05/11/05 (21)
- Re: quantum material - geoffkait 09:15:59 05/11/05 (0)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 08:37:34 05/11/05 (19)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 00:29:48 05/12/05 (18)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 03:18:59 05/12/05 (17)
- Your bird told you right! - KlausR. 05:16:10 05/12/05 (16)
- Re: Your bird told you right! - geoffkait 06:20:13 05/12/05 (15)
- Hold on, Geoff! - KlausR. 06:34:34 05/12/05 (14)
- Re: East is East - geoffkait 07:37:45 05/12/05 (13)
- I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 08:00:57 05/12/05 (12)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - geoffkait 16:30:56 05/12/05 (11)
- Expert opinion about DBT - KlausR. 03:07:30 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: Expert opinion about DBT - geoffkait 03:40:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 01:49:42 05/13/05 (8)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 03:38:09 05/13/05 (7)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 04:08:25 05/13/05 (6)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 05:38:07 05/13/05 (5)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 07:03:39 05/13/05 (4)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 07:23:30 05/13/05 (2)
- Re: The full story - KlausR. 08:07:17 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 11:02:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Homework, due diligence, etc.... - pburant 07:08:58 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: intermission - geoffkait 11:34:49 05/10/05 (0)
- Additional question - KlausR. 09:31:18 05/08/05 (5)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 09:41:02 05/08/05 (4)
- Next question! - KlausR. 10:04:10 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 09:54:27 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 11:07:13 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 11:35:30 05/08/05 (0)
- Face it Klaus... - BS64 11:58:03 05/07/05 (11)
- Re: "we never get a worthy explanation" - geoffkait 12:08:14 05/07/05 (10)
- a misquote and misunderstanding on your part - BS64 16:10:02 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: "we never get a worthy explanation" - Steve Eddy 14:48:26 05/07/05 (8)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 15:37:52 05/07/05 (7)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 17:30:20 05/07/05 (6)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 18:38:12 05/07/05 (5)
- "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - BS64 10:22:10 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - Steve Eddy 10:33:45 05/08/05 (1)
- "Simple. Tactics." - BS64 10:40:24 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 21:00:13 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 02:02:53 05/08/05 (0)