Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Re: legitimate disagreement

You misunderstand; I'm not saying every explanation should be accepted. I am saying, in this case, my statements have been rejected (by Klaus) because he has apparently made his mind up (on the subject of the Chip containing a quantum dot), so anything having to do with quantum dots or fluorescence or light-matter interaction is rejected.

"Legitimate disagreement" is the key phrase. There can be no legitimate discussion of quantum dots without at least some legitimate "homework," as I call it. Doesn't that seem fair? Continuing along the lines of "that cannot be" or "that is impossible" is not a legitimate form of disagreement in my book.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.