In Reply to: Because I did not think for one second... posted by KlausR. on May 5, 2005 at 10:34:21:
Klaus, once again, we don't HAVE to tell you 'squat' (American term for anything at all). Not one of us makes the chip, or completely understands how it could possibly work. That is a given. We only can report what we heard when we tried the chip and how it 'might' work. Initially, everyone of us was very skeptical and thought this was some sort of 'joke', but each of us tried it, at separate times, and found that it did something useful, and we have reported our experiences online.
Now, what have I gotten out of all this? Well I got a quote of me reported by Jim Austin, put in 'Stereophile' in order to make me look foolish. (Thanks also, Jon Atkinson, for allowing this, in his job as editor of the same magazine).
I have never gotten a chip, or any other renumeration for talking about this chip, and I seriously doubt that Clark Johnsen has either. We just have found it interesting and have noted how foolish the critics of the chip have behaved, without even studying the chip itself or (in most instances) even trying one.
Klaus, for showing yourself as predisposed against the chip, and capable of lying about information found that might explain the chip, we have decided to ignore your senseless demands for us to prove something to you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Because I did not think for one second... - john curl 11:54:51 05/05/05 (107)
- Re: Because I did not think for one second... - Steve Eddy 09:03:21 05/06/05 (0)
- Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - KlausR. 04:58:17 05/06/05 (102)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - john curl 12:03:41 05/06/05 (84)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - KlausR. 22:42:19 05/06/05 (74)
- Yes, a lie is a lie - michaelb 04:24:21 05/07/05 (73)
- Re: Yes, a lie is a lie - KlausR. 08:19:56 05/07/05 (72)
- "No one would have ever known" - michaelb 09:29:37 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - geoffkait 08:49:03 05/07/05 (70)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - KlausR. 10:59:57 05/07/05 (67)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - geoffkait 13:20:35 05/07/05 (54)
- We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - KlausR. 22:54:23 05/07/05 (53)
- Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - geoffkait 02:48:52 05/08/05 (52)
- Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - KlausR. 03:42:54 05/08/05 (51)
- Re: "Light is light" - geoffkait 05:10:41 05/08/05 (50)
- No more wave-particle dualism? - KlausR. 06:22:43 05/08/05 (49)
- Re: wave-particle dualism - geoffkait 06:48:11 05/08/05 (48)
- Your TV anecdote - KlausR. 09:07:57 05/08/05 (47)
- Re: CDP laser - geoffkait 09:35:07 05/08/05 (40)
- Re: CDP laser - KlausR. 09:58:27 05/08/05 (39)
- Re: Fatal Flaw - geoffkait 10:52:51 05/08/05 (38)
- Flaw, there's lots of them - KlausR. 11:03:48 05/08/05 (37)
- Re: There's a flaw, allright - geoffkait 11:20:46 05/08/05 (36)
- Flaws there are... - KlausR. 01:47:14 05/09/05 (35)
- Re: Sleepy Time - geoffkait 04:30:56 05/09/05 (34)
- Re: Sleepy Time - KlausR. 05:28:52 05/09/05 (33)
- Re: - geoffkait 06:23:29 05/09/05 (32)
- Photons and CDP - KlausR. 23:10:39 05/09/05 (31)
- Re: Photons and CDP - geoffkait 03:02:05 05/10/05 (30)
- Laser light - KlausR. 03:48:34 05/10/05 (29)
- Re: Laser light - geoffkait 04:52:18 05/10/05 (28)
- Re: Laser light - KlausR. 08:56:45 05/10/05 (27)
- Re: Photons and Metals - geoffkait 18:55:59 05/10/05 (25)
- Re:I call Bullshit - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:16:45 05/19/05 (0)
- Re: - KlausR. 03:07:13 05/11/05 (23)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 05:40:40 05/11/05 (22)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 07:47:14 05/11/05 (21)
- Re: quantum material - geoffkait 09:15:59 05/11/05 (0)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 08:37:34 05/11/05 (19)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 00:29:48 05/12/05 (18)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 03:18:59 05/12/05 (17)
- Your bird told you right! - KlausR. 05:16:10 05/12/05 (16)
- Re: Your bird told you right! - geoffkait 06:20:13 05/12/05 (15)
- Hold on, Geoff! - KlausR. 06:34:34 05/12/05 (14)
- Re: East is East - geoffkait 07:37:45 05/12/05 (13)
- I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 08:00:57 05/12/05 (12)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - geoffkait 16:30:56 05/12/05 (11)
- Expert opinion about DBT - KlausR. 03:07:30 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: Expert opinion about DBT - geoffkait 03:40:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 01:49:42 05/13/05 (8)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 03:38:09 05/13/05 (7)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 04:08:25 05/13/05 (6)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 05:38:07 05/13/05 (5)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 07:03:39 05/13/05 (4)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 07:23:30 05/13/05 (2)
- Re: The full story - KlausR. 08:07:17 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 11:02:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Homework, due diligence, etc.... - pburant 07:08:58 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: intermission - geoffkait 11:34:49 05/10/05 (0)
- Additional question - KlausR. 09:31:18 05/08/05 (5)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 09:41:02 05/08/05 (4)
- Next question! - KlausR. 10:04:10 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 09:54:27 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 11:07:13 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 11:35:30 05/08/05 (0)
- Face it Klaus... - BS64 11:58:03 05/07/05 (11)
- Re: "we never get a worthy explanation" - geoffkait 12:08:14 05/07/05 (10)
- a misquote and misunderstanding on your part - BS64 16:10:02 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: "we never get a worthy explanation" - Steve Eddy 14:48:26 05/07/05 (8)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 15:37:52 05/07/05 (7)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 17:30:20 05/07/05 (6)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 18:38:12 05/07/05 (5)
- "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - BS64 10:22:10 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - Steve Eddy 10:33:45 05/08/05 (1)
- "Simple. Tactics." - BS64 10:40:24 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 21:00:13 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 02:02:53 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - Steve Eddy 09:26:20 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: smokescreen - geoffkait 09:44:49 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - Steve Eddy 14:10:58 05/06/05 (8)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - john curl 16:09:10 05/06/05 (7)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - Steve Eddy 17:55:44 05/06/05 (6)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - john curl 22:19:23 05/06/05 (5)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - Steve Eddy 23:39:10 05/06/05 (0)
- Moral superiority - KlausR. 22:55:50 05/06/05 (3)
- Re: Moral superiority - john curl 11:22:38 05/07/05 (2)
- Re: Answers - geoffkait 16:26:53 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Moral superiority - Steve Eddy 14:02:31 05/07/05 (0)
- Klaus, with all due respect... - Wellfed 10:20:33 05/06/05 (16)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - Steve Eddy 23:18:36 05/06/05 (3)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - Wellfed 09:21:46 05/07/05 (2)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - Steve Eddy 14:19:20 05/07/05 (1)
- Since you're one of the brighter bulbs on the tree Ernest... - Wellfed 16:55:37 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - KlausR. 22:22:20 05/06/05 (0)
- The darkside of electronics - jbmcb 11:28:33 05/06/05 (10)
- Re: The darkside of electronics - Wellfed 09:06:25 05/07/05 (9)
- My point is simple too - KlausR. 01:07:04 05/08/05 (8)
- Re: My point is simple too - Steve Eddy 09:28:34 05/08/05 (7)
- Re: Understanding of science - geoffkait 14:28:49 05/08/05 (6)
- Re: Understanding of science - Steve Eddy 16:26:36 05/08/05 (5)
- Re: State of Bliss - geoffkait 19:08:33 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: State of Bliss - Steve Eddy 20:01:52 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Understanding of science - john curl 17:50:41 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: Understanding of science - Steve Eddy 19:03:57 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Understanding of science - john curl 20:11:05 05/08/05 (0)
- Diddlysquat - Al Sekela 14:59:39 05/05/05 (0)
- " ..........how foolish the critics of the chip have behaved, without even studying the chip itself" - clifff 12:52:46 05/05/05 (0)
- Re: Because I did not think for one second... - john curl 12:36:57 05/05/05 (0)