In Reply to: Re: Trust Ma' Bell and her babies... posted by david hull on September 4, 2003 at 19:20:38:
Actually, I was talking about e/m theory from the 40's and 50's, where they understood prop speed vs frequency.Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Trust Ma' Bell and her babies... - jneutron 05:39:49 09/05/03 (15)
- Re: Trust Ma' Bell and her babies... - david hull 09:09:48 09/05/03 (14)
- Sorry to break up this little love fest.... - Commuteman 11:28:47 09/05/03 (11)
- Re: Sorry to break up this little love fest.... - david hull 15:42:52 09/05/03 (0)
- Hi Peter - jneutron 12:29:45 09/05/03 (9)
- Because it was there? (and not here...) - Commuteman 12:56:08 09/05/03 (8)
- Re: Because it was there? (and not here...) - Dan Banquer 17:44:29 09/05/03 (2)
- true enough - Commuteman 21:56:13 09/05/03 (1)
- Re: true enough - Dan Banquer 05:17:58 09/06/03 (0)
- (Insert punchy title here) - jneutron 13:07:41 09/05/03 (4)
- This site certainly spawns lots of reading projects... - Commuteman 15:11:10 09/05/03 (3)
- Re: This site certainly spawns lots of reading projects... - david hull 15:53:36 09/05/03 (2)
- Sorry about the earlier post... - Commuteman 21:51:06 09/05/03 (1)
- No big deal... <nt> - david hull 10:52:13 09/06/03 (0)
- Re: Trust Ma' Bell and her babies... - jneutron 10:03:34 09/05/03 (1)
- Re: Trust Ma' Bell and her babies... - Dan Banquer 10:53:09 09/05/03 (0)