In Reply to: "So yeah, consipracy fits nicely." posted by clarkjohnsen on June 6, 2003 at 13:21:25:
"And it was YOU who escalated the argument to lunar landing;"Again, you are wrong, I mearly followed on.
"And it's YOU who's attempting to obscure the subject matter of my article"
Well, if you had never responded to any of my posts in the first place.....
"It was YOU who brought up the USSR"
I most certainly did. It is one of the supporting reasons the believers of the big fake bring forth to bolster their argument. Deal with it as you may.
" They find evidence, then adduce a theory. That theory may be true, incomplete, partially mistaken or untrue. It's just a theory!"
Yeah, but they have this bad habit of trying to pass their speculations on as fact without doing the necessary research, so when it is brought to thier attention that they are all wet, we get the typical responses similar to what you have been doing. So now you're going to go hide since you cannot possibly explain away the expsure problem with not seeing stars in the NASA photos. Typical, going to run and hide now that your ears are pinned back and did so without scorn or mockery, just the facts.
"my article, one which I notice won plaudits almost all 'round."
Well, considering you said it was all a lie......
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "So yeah, consipracy fits nicely." - Jitter_by_Coffee 15:16:13 06/06/03 (0)