In Reply to: "Do you have any concrete information regarding staged moon pictures?" posted by clarkjohnsen on June 5, 2003 at 14:07:06:
Regardless of the "illegitimate" photos, as I've seen them demonstrated on TV, and seen them countered on TV as well as not a hoax, there's something remarkable that makes the moving pictures pretty good proof that they were on the moon. If you watch closely as I have, no matter how much a lunar rover kicked up the dust and rocks and all, and no matter how much a man on the moon kicked up the same dust, all of the debris fell back to the ground at exactly the same rate. And where was all that dust in the air? Heading back to the ground, all at the same rate, as it would in a pure vacuum. There's no faking that. Not even Hollywood today could fake it that good. It would be easier to put a man on the moon.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Do you have any concrete information regarding staged moon pictures?" - kurt s 18:24:53 06/05/03 (38)
- Where are the stars? Do you believe stars cannot be seen from the moon? - clarkjohnsen 20:41:06 06/05/03 (37)
- Now that's strange? - Monstrous Mike 10:36:48 06/07/03 (0)
- ask someone who was there - TommyK 19:50:17 06/06/03 (1)
- Re: ask someone who was there - geoffkait 05:21:21 06/07/03 (0)
- To make a distinction... - Top Jimmy 00:09:35 06/06/03 (5)
- "The essay you reprinted in your latest article could..." - clarkjohnsen 06:18:16 06/06/03 (4)
- Glad I could make you laugh - Top Jimmy 10:26:03 06/06/03 (3)
- You shall remain stupefied and deceived so long as you... - clarkjohnsen 13:06:00 06/06/03 (2)
- Concept is not understood here.... - Monstrous Mike 00:43:09 06/08/03 (0)
- Re: You shall remain stupefied and deceived so long as you... - Jitter_by_Coffee 00:51:29 06/07/03 (0)
- How do you judge level... - Top Jimmy 13:37:56 06/06/03 (0)
- OH PLEASE! - Jitter_by_Coffee 22:42:54 06/05/03 (23)
- "the reflective surface of the moon glaring at you." - clarkjohnsen 06:27:27 06/06/03 (22)
- Re: "the reflective surface of the moon glaring at you." - Jitter_by_Coffee 08:54:38 06/06/03 (0)
- Re: "the reflective surface of the moon glaring at you." - jneutron 07:15:40 06/06/03 (20)
- "I can't believe everybody would forget the stars." - clarkjohnsen 07:22:29 06/06/03 (19)
- Re: "I can't believe everybody would forget the stars." - Jitter_by_Coffee 08:56:49 06/06/03 (10)
- "Typical conspiracy tactic to change the story." - clarkjohnsen 09:35:20 06/06/03 (9)
- Re: "Typical conspiracy tactic to change the story." - Jitter_by_Coffee 10:16:12 06/06/03 (8)
- Your STS-9 link appears to be NFG. - david hull 11:58:49 06/07/03 (2)
- Re: Your STS-9 link appears to be NFG. - Jitter_by_Coffee 22:32:03 06/07/03 (1)
- So that's the trick -- found it (interesting site) <nt> - david hull 20:55:19 06/10/03 (0)
- You're confused. Start drinking less coffee and stick to the subject. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:24:55 06/06/03 (4)
- Re: You're confused. Start drinking less coffee and stick to the subject. nt - Jitter_by_Coffee 15:19:48 06/06/03 (3)
- Can we see stars on earth during the day?...nt - Monstrous Mike 00:37:48 06/08/03 (2)
- Say! Is this a trick quesion??...nt - Jitter_by_Coffee 15:26:31 06/08/03 (1)
- Not really.... - Monstrous Mike 16:14:47 06/08/03 (0)
- Re: "I can't believe everybody would forget the stars." - sunnysal 07:55:13 06/06/03 (0)
- Re: "I can't believe everybody would forget the stars." - jneutron 07:46:52 06/06/03 (6)
- I thought I was using humor and irony... - jneutron 07:57:29 06/06/03 (4)
- Re: I thought I was using humor and irony... - Dan Banquer 16:06:05 06/07/03 (0)
- Strange, I posted this under Clark's response..nt - jneutron 08:08:57 06/06/03 (2)
- It's a conspiracy! nt - clarkjohnsen 13:07:07 06/06/03 (1)
- I knew that!!!!!!!!!!!!nt. - jneutron 20:41:08 06/06/03 (0)
- Ah! Where the sense of irony, of humor, these days? - clarkjohnsen 07:52:54 06/06/03 (0)
- Try Capturing Stars with Your Video Camera... - Todd Krieger 22:38:24 06/05/03 (2)
- But how about a Hasselblad with Kodak high-rez emulsion?... nt - clarkjohnsen 06:24:05 06/06/03 (1)
- Still doesn't have enough exposure latitude.(nt) - Jitter_by_Coffee 09:43:24 06/06/03 (0)