In Reply to: Re: I don't think so. posted by WinthorpeIII on January 23, 2007 at 13:03:28:
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Pls qualify your "dynamic slam". (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:16:37 01/23/07 (16)
- Re: Pls qualify your "dynamic slam". (nt) - WinthorpeIII 13:38:49 01/23/07 (15)
- I'll add to the anecdotal evidence. - Ted Smith 16:33:46 01/23/07 (14)
- ok - WinthorpeIII 16:45:49 01/23/07 (13)
- Re: ok - thetubeguy1954 06:27:12 01/24/07 (11)
- Re: ok - WinthorpeIII 06:45:14 01/24/07 (10)
- ""The equations are great, the theory is nice"" - jneutron 08:42:31 01/24/07 (9)
- "Correlation between the physical parameters of the cables and audibility within various systems will eventually happen" - WinthorpeIII 09:08:00 01/24/07 (8)
- Re: "Correlation between the physical parameters of the cables and audibility within various systems will eventually hap - kerr 10:03:15 01/24/07 (7)
- Re: "Correlation between the physical parameters of the cables and audibility within various systems will eventually hap - WinthorpeIII 10:44:25 01/24/07 (2)
- Re: "Correlation between the physical parameters of the cables and audibility within various systems will eventually hap - kerr 11:15:25 01/24/07 (1)
- True enough about the necessary skills - WinthorpeIII 11:35:25 01/24/07 (0)
- fact is that many cables sound different; the reasons why are unknown at this point, hopefully to be explained someday - jneutron 10:10:46 01/24/07 (3)
- Hey don't beat yourself up... - bjh 15:55:35 01/24/07 (1)
- Re: Hey don't beat yourself up... - jneutron 16:14:46 01/24/07 (0)
- "pffft..yah, right..and what, I'm supposed to believe you???" - kerr 11:08:21 01/24/07 (0)
- Re: ok - Ted Smith 16:58:22 01/23/07 (0)