In Reply to: The CD medium is far more capable than LP posted by Pat D on December 4, 2005 at 10:32:01:
That doesn't leave enough dynamic range for Redbook to be useable for decent SQ recording as the pros have acknowledged en masse for going on a decade now. This is a distortion mechanism which does not apply to analog media such as LP, btw.The sonic effect of rising quantization distortion at lower levels in some ways is analogous to that of crossover distortion in amplifiers but is actually more damaging to low level detail (microdetail).
And sixteen bits of resolution is seldom actually delivered by Redbook media due to requantization, equalization, and sometimes mixing even with 24 bit mastering.
Then there is the sonic thumbprint caused by brick wall filtering causing severe ringing at the Nyquist rate and seriously altering the nature of high frequencies passed through this processing.
Audio professionals have seen the light and have abandoned the inadequate 16 bit 44.1 - 48 ks/s standard years ago for serious recording applications.
How is it a justification to embrace Redbook when the best thing that can be said about it is that only some otherwise magnificent recordings are not completely degraded by being passed through it? That sounds like a reason to reject it to me.
'Perfect Sound Forever'...? My ass.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- CD rising quantization distortion over lowest 30db several percent or more=bad sonic news - Tom Dawson 15:59:15 12/04/05 (27)
- Re: CD rising quantization distortion over lowest 30db several percent or more=bad sonic news - john curl 09:42:14 12/05/05 (17)
- Y'all confused, John? - Silver Eared John 00:47:09 12/06/05 (16)
- Re: Y'all confused, John? - john curl 10:51:52 12/06/05 (15)
- Yep, y'all don't get it. - Silver Eared John 21:22:05 12/06/05 (14)
- Re: Yep, y'all don't get it. - john curl 22:32:48 12/06/05 (13)
- No, John, you're still wrong. - Silver Eared John 23:25:25 12/07/05 (12)
- Re: No, John, you're still wrong. - john curl 10:26:50 12/08/05 (11)
- If y'all remove the dither, y'all aren't doing it right. - Silver Eared John 16:11:56 12/08/05 (10)
- Re: If y'all remove the dither, y'all aren't doing it right. - john curl 10:04:07 12/09/05 (9)
- Re: Better analogy - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 20:15:00 12/10/05 (4)
- Re: Better analogy - john curl 20:47:29 12/10/05 (3)
- Re: Better analogy - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 03:52:56 12/11/05 (2)
- Re: Better analogy - john curl 12:01:25 12/11/05 (1)
- Y'all wrong again... - Silver Eared John 23:36:04 12/13/05 (0)
- Y'all are dodging... - Silver Eared John 11:15:03 12/09/05 (3)
- Re: Y'all are dodging... - Tom Dawson 07:26:22 12/12/05 (0)
- Re: Y'all are dodging... - john curl 14:02:14 12/09/05 (1)
- Y'all remove dither, it's broke. - Silver Eared John 14:20:20 12/09/05 (0)
- Y'all jokin', right? - Silver Eared John 00:09:21 12/05/05 (5)
- Geez-o-weez! Just check any prosound mixer or recorder on the market. Even the cheap ones are 24 bit - Tom Dawson 13:07:22 12/05/05 (3)
- Yeah, they certainly are... - Silver Eared John 17:16:45 12/05/05 (2)
- What would happen... - Wellfed 04:48:40 12/10/05 (1)
- Well, you'd get a touch too many bits :) - Silver Eared John 18:35:01 12/10/05 (0)
- Naw, they ain't jokin'! - Pat D 12:26:03 12/05/05 (0)
- CD is a much better medium than LP. - Pat D 23:54:36 12/04/05 (2)
- "Lots" of magnificent recordings on CD? Not to my ears. - Tom Dawson 12:43:18 12/05/05 (1)
- You must listen to different CDs than I do. - Pat D 15:14:36 12/05/05 (0)