In Reply to: The BIGGEST Lies Objectivists Tell About Subjectivists (Part 1) posted by thetubeguy1954 on March 9, 2007 at 07:57:46:
Peter Aczel sometimes gets into personalities, too, but his main emphasis is on whether certain things are true or not. You, however, are explicitly making the topic things some people say about other people, which is not really an audio topic.One also wonders who you are to speak on behalf of subjectivists. As well, so far, your main "objectivist" seems to be AJinFla, whom you take to be representative of "objectivists," whatever they may be asw you do not begin to define that. So, you are really attacking AJinFla rather than "objectivists" as a whole. Your diatribe really reduces to personal vendetta which you try to hide by generalizing it.
You propose that most subjectivists accept the following:
TG54
"There are measurements that correlate to everything we hear in audio components be it amps, wires, etc. However the typical measurements used today in audio don’t correlate with what we hear."The trouble is that most rationalists accept that as well. jj said the same thing, for example. So there is nothing peculiar to subjectivists here.
The amp specifications you provide look to be very good, as far as they go. I wouldn't even consider it, however, without some indications as to what its power capabilities are!
Now, as for your questions. First of all, you as for a single parameter to define soundstage, imaging, resolution, and accuracy. It is much more complex than that. It takes an ensemble.
As for producing an illusion of a live performance, this seems to do a pretty good job. We could not manage a trip down to hear it at the time, but Wes Philips has a write up:
http://www.onhifi.com/features/20010615.htm
Second, soundstaging, imaging, and psychoacoustic realism are functions of the program materials, processing, speakers, and set up than they are functions of an amplifier. But I personally look to an amp to reproduce the signals input in amplified form so as to drive speakers. Some amplifiers, especially those with high output impedances, may benefit some speakers which need that.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Personalities again. Why not say something about audio? - Pat D 12:31:02 03/09/07 (14)
- I AM Talking About Audio - thetubeguy1954 13:35:19 03/09/07 (13)
- Yes you ARE. They just don't want to hear what you're saying. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:40:07 03/11/07 (1)
- I Know I Am! I Also Know Not One Of Them Has Actually Addressed The Topic Of The Post - thetubeguy1954 08:23:14 03/12/07 (0)
- You are pursuing a personal battle with AJinFla, not with objectivists - Pat D 16:18:37 03/09/07 (10)
- Believe What You Want To Pat - thetubeguy1954 13:15:13 03/12/07 (0)
- He's battling his own demons. I've simply become the lightning rod for his insecurities (nt) - AJinFLA 06:05:33 03/10/07 (8)
- Your A Lightning Rod Due To The Stupity Of Your Posts! - thetubeguy1954 13:25:26 03/12/07 (0)
- Re: He's battling his own demons. I've simply become the lightning rod for his insecurities (nt) - Pat D 07:51:16 03/10/07 (6)
- Pat All These Posts About Me & You Claim I'm Personalizing The Arguement - thetubeguy1954 13:28:40 03/12/07 (5)
- It's meta-discussion about the nature of some of your posts. - Pat D 18:16:23 03/12/07 (4)
- No Matter Who You Slice It You're Personalizing It, Like You Berated Me For Doing.... - thetubeguy1954 05:56:45 03/13/07 (3)
- Well, if your topic is confused and contrary to fact, don't expect me to say differently. (nt) - Pat D 06:52:54 03/13/07 (2)
- I'm Sorry You're So Easily Confused Pat - thetubeguy1954 07:37:35 03/13/07 (1)
- Both off topic (which you now admit) and contrary to fact. - Pat D 11:37:13 03/14/07 (0)