In Reply to: Re: Don't think so posted by kurt s on June 26, 2003 at 08:18:24:
Er, show me a standard textbook that does *not* model it in this way. Because it seems intuitively wrong, as Charlie points out, I would like to see a formal argument against it. But I can't find one anywhere.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Don't think so - Scott Frankland 09:11:51 06/26/03 (9)
- Re: Don't think so - kurt s 09:52:02 06/26/03 (8)
- Re: Don't think so - Scott Frankland 11:25:49 06/26/03 (7)
- side question on feedback - mfc 21:38:48 06/26/03 (4)
- Re: side question on feedback - Scott Frankland 22:57:16 06/26/03 (0)
- Re: side question on feedback - kurt s 22:19:05 06/26/03 (2)
- Re: side question on feedback - Scott Frankland 23:18:13 06/26/03 (1)
- Re: side question on feedback, correction - Scott Frankland 14:33:30 06/27/03 (0)
- Re: Don't think so - john curl 15:14:27 06/26/03 (0)
- That sums it up. - kurt s 11:57:15 06/26/03 (0)