In Reply to: I don't completely agree... posted by Charles Hansen on June 25, 2003 at 09:31:16:
Hi,>"feedback" clearly implies that the signal is being "fed" from one
>point in the circuit "back" to a point earlier in the circuit. This >does not happen with a follower (or when using an unbypassed >resistor in the emitter/source/cathode of a common->emitter/source/cathode gain stage).I think a lot of the reason why some people don't like the sound
of followers is because they actually are feedback devices. I've
done some hi-resolution simulations on various devices and proved
(at least to myself) that feedback lowers low-order harmonics at
the expense of raising hi-order harmonics.You need to apply a lot of feedback to get beyond this effect. See
for instance Cheever's thesis - figure 2-15 page 58. I think
Baxendall has an article on this topic from the 70's but I haven't
seen it.If feedback increases harmonics at the 7th harmonic and beyond,
this *may* cause some real irritating effects. Its hard to say for
sure as it's the overall recipe of sound thats important.Mike
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Feedback - mfc 18:47:24 06/25/03 (25)
- Actually, I believe you are reinforcing my point.... - Charles Hansen 20:10:58 06/25/03 (24)
- Re: Don't think so - mfc 21:26:27 06/25/03 (23)
- I still think so... - Charles Hansen 17:12:27 06/26/03 (6)
- Re: I still think so... - mfc 18:23:54 06/26/03 (5)
- Re: I still think so... - john curl 00:13:11 06/27/03 (4)
- common cathode unbypassed cathode resistor results - mfc 23:29:33 06/28/03 (3)
- Thanks, mfc. Nice work. nt - kurt s 18:24:48 06/29/03 (0)
- Re: common cathode unbypassed cathode resistor results - john curl 16:06:46 06/29/03 (0)
- Re: common cathode unbypassed cathode resistor results - Scott Frankland 15:54:18 06/29/03 (0)
- Re: Don't think so - kurt s 08:18:24 06/26/03 (10)
- Re: Don't think so - Scott Frankland 09:11:51 06/26/03 (9)
- Re: Don't think so - kurt s 09:52:02 06/26/03 (8)
- Re: Don't think so - Scott Frankland 11:25:49 06/26/03 (7)
- side question on feedback - mfc 21:38:48 06/26/03 (4)
- Re: side question on feedback - Scott Frankland 22:57:16 06/26/03 (0)
- Re: side question on feedback - kurt s 22:19:05 06/26/03 (2)
- Re: side question on feedback - Scott Frankland 23:18:13 06/26/03 (1)
- Re: side question on feedback, correction - Scott Frankland 14:33:30 06/27/03 (0)
- Re: Don't think so - john curl 15:14:27 06/26/03 (0)
- That sums it up. - kurt s 11:57:15 06/26/03 (0)
- Re: Don't think so - Steve Eddy 21:59:19 06/25/03 (4)
- Care to elaborate? - mfc 08:28:27 06/26/03 (3)
- Re: Care to elaborate? - Steve Eddy 10:20:01 06/26/03 (2)
- Re: Care to elaborate? - mfc 20:57:39 06/26/03 (1)
- Re: Care to elaborate? - Steve Eddy 21:13:06 06/26/03 (0)