In Reply to: Allen Modwright SCD-1/777 users chime in please posted by SnaggS on September 6, 2006 at 02:04:34:
I read this in one of the reviews of your 777ES Mod;"The DSD signal completely bypasses Sony's DAC and multiple op-amp audio output section, and
is fed directly to the new output stage, using no DAC at all. Conveniently, Sony's digital chips also convert the
redbook signal to a DSD-like signal, so it can also be reproduced without any DAC."http://www.dagogo.com/SonySCD777VSEI.html
Now.. I remember on the early SACD's that they showed it was the case, that all you needed was a high pass filter.. but I just don't understand how this works.
Are you basically taking an amplified signal from the laser, running it through a analog filter and then pumping that through a amplification stage?
Doesn't that really make SACD analog? What would have been the Japanese engineers reason for doing it the way they did? There must have been some trade-offs, even if only theorectical.
Daniel.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Allen : how come DSD doesn't need a DAC? Doesn't that mean SACD is analog? - SnaggS 21:00:50 09/06/06 (29)
- It's a matter of semantics... - Ted Smith 22:33:42 09/06/06 (28)
- Yep, plus bypassing a DAC is not necessarily a good thing ... - Christine Tham 15:36:37 09/07/06 (27)
- so that the slew rate limited circuit is doing most ...) - Allen Wright 03:12:33 09/08/06 (26)
- Gee you are lazy - do your own research - Christine Tham 04:21:45 09/08/06 (25)
- Isn't this just brilliant? - Allen Wright 05:36:35 09/09/06 (21)
- You really don't get it, do you? - Christine Tham 16:47:35 09/09/06 (20)
- When it gets personal, it's not worth a reply! (nt) - Allen Wright 04:00:58 09/10/06 (0)
- Christine, what is your recommendation.. - SnaggS 00:36:54 09/10/06 (18)
- Not knowing more about your tastes, it's hard to give a recommendation ... - Christine Tham 14:35:02 09/10/06 (2)
- "Gushing?" - Ozzie 11:08:02 09/11/06 (0)
- Thankyou! {nt} - SnaggS 02:13:00 09/11/06 (0)
- Re: SCD-1/777ES mods.. - Dave Garretson 06:00:30 09/10/06 (14)
- I believe that VSEI's DAC bypass is relevant to SACD only... - Allen Wright 10:01:53 09/10/06 (13)
- Re: DAC bypass is relevant to SACD only... - Dave Garretson 12:50:08 09/10/06 (12)
- I stand corrected - it is marked as a DAC by SONY even though... - Allen Wright 02:16:48 09/11/06 (0)
- The S-Tact device is a DAC, no doubt - Ric Schultz 14:17:11 09/10/06 (10)
- Careful, Rick... - Allen Wright 01:59:56 09/11/06 (0)
- Re: The S-Tact device is a DAC, no doubt - Dave Garretson 17:33:36 09/10/06 (8)
- Tell me more.. what transformer did you use? - SnaggS 02:19:07 09/11/06 (6)
- silver transformer outputs = $$$ - Ozzie 10:28:58 09/13/06 (1)
- Re: Not quite so expensive... - Dave Garretson 12:30:10 09/13/06 (0)
- Re: Transformers in SCD-1/777ES - Dave Garretson 07:01:53 09/11/06 (3)
- Slagle transformers are less exspensive, not cheaper.. - Retsel 14:08:16 09/12/06 (2)
- Re: Slagle transformers are less exspensive, not cheaper.. - Dave Garretson 02:03:08 09/13/06 (1)
- Re: Slagle transformers - Dave Garretson 04:46:17 09/14/06 (0)
- And it sounds even better if you come off BEFORE the S-TACT... - Allen Wright 01:52:15 09/11/06 (0)
- Re: Gee you are lazy - do your own research - Ted Smith 07:57:07 09/08/06 (2)
- Re: Gee you are lazy - do your own research - Christine Tham 01:12:39 09/09/06 (1)
- Re: Gee you are lazy - do your own research - tedbaron 05:53:23 09/11/06 (0)