In Reply to: Ok, so the PSR is very cool posted by Commuteman on November 3, 2005 at 21:09:48:
Well, if y'all listen to 2 channels, it's more compressed than that stuff, I bet.Why would y'all call it compression when you use 2/5 of the channels?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Compression, y'all say? - Silver Eared John 17:59:45 11/05/05 (17)
- Huh? - Commuteman 11:01:04 11/07/05 (16)
- Y'all got a point? - Silver Eared John 12:13:10 11/07/05 (15)
- Re: Y'all got a point? - Commuteman 13:36:06 11/07/05 (14)
- Yeah, I'm surprised... - Silver Eared John 15:39:54 11/07/05 (13)
- Now I'm Convinced..... - Todd Krieger 21:21:46 11/12/05 (0)
- Why do I think he's all about compression? - Commuteman 16:27:31 11/07/05 (11)
- Re: Why do I think he's all about compression? - Silver Eared John 10:43:42 11/08/05 (8)
- Ok, so 98% of his work was about compression and lower quality sound...(nt) - mkuller 12:17:05 11/08/05 (7)
- So, y'all, compression is lower quality sound? - Silver Eared John 13:24:47 11/10/05 (5)
- Not if it's lossless... - Commuteman 15:38:29 11/10/05 (2)
- It's not clear what you think, sorry... - Silver Eared John 13:17:59 11/11/05 (1)
- It's pretty simple, IMO - Commuteman 10:35:46 11/15/05 (0)
- Lower sound quality - try MPEG4...(nt) - mkuller 15:08:48 11/10/05 (1)
- What MPEG 4 sound stuff you mean? - Silver Eared John 13:18:32 11/11/05 (0)
- Stop jumping to such obvious conclusions! - Commuteman 13:50:10 11/08/05 (0)
- Re: Why do I think he's all about compression? - john curl 10:24:13 11/08/05 (1)
- Re: Why do I think he's all about compression? - john curl 10:32:40 11/08/05 (0)