In Reply to: Teresa, - that is horsepucky... posted by Sordidman on May 10, 2006 at 10:54:31:
Hi guysI agree with Teresa but not for the same reasons.SACD IS better than cd.DVD-Audio,well...close,but no cigar.To my ears,it still sounds digital.sacd may fool you,in a way :)
No,cd,sacd and dvd-audio,no matter how they are recorder (24 bit 128 khz whatever) can't touch vinyl in 3 areas.Dimensionality,high frequencies and lack of hardness. Believe me,i am no analoque addict.
I wish i could throw away all my lps and get a small silver disc that needs no careful storing and cleaning let alone the hussle to have to turn the lp to listen to side b. Anyway,Teresa says sacd is better than cd and yes,i agree,but i have in my collection certain hdcd cd that to my ears are better than sacd but hey,everyone is entitled to his/her opinion,right ?
Cary 306/200 Denon dvd-5910 in case you are wondering what "junk" i am using. lol
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Teresa, - that is horsepucky...(Wait-a-minute) - Yiangos 07:06:27 05/11/06 (2)
- If you are referring to Reference Recordings HDCDs I agree and here is why - Teresa 04:37:11 05/13/06 (0)
- Re: Teresa, - that is horsepucky...(Wait-a-minute) - Sordidman 11:33:13 05/11/06 (0)