|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: RCA Living Stereo: give me two-channel or give me death! posted by bublitchki on May 11, 2006 at 00:42:28:
No contest in my experience for what I've tried just utilizing a Denon 3803AVR and a $100 SACD/DVD player! No, I didn't mean to imply anything more than 3 channel where appropriate for MCH in my post.Not sure why some folks are locked into doing comparisons between LPs and SACDs as they are two entirely different formats on different equipment. I suppose I can understand the comparisons from a curiousity perspective and I do welcome their feedback. But isn't it the old CD for which folks should be comparing SACD to???? Folks here without TTs aren't going to run out and buy one even if all folks here that one have one all admit vinyl beats SACD. Even with a TT, I'm not playing to buy any expensive "audiophile LPs" especially since I have a $500 TT versus a $2k SACD player. The LS SACDs are only $10 and most SACDs are under $20.
In most every case BTW for what I've tried (classical), MCH trumps two channel SACD. It's to the point I don't even bother listening to the SACD two channel track any more. I admit most can easily live with the two channel SACD over the CD but 3 channel is another step or two up on the ladder for which I enjoy even more! :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 3 Channel Versus 2 - Robertc88 03:56:17 05/11/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
