In Reply to: Re: Your translation is inbedded in the age old debate and has nothing to do with what I am saying posted by john curl on April 3, 2007 at 17:09:28:
But I have yet to read any *research* published in the JAES that tests any of the contrveries in audio. So how can we discuss whether or not any reports of certain contrversial experiences even apply to the original post? Has the JAES ever rejected any "studies" of the audibility of tweaks, wires, amps etc other than the one Tom Nousaine allegedly submitted? And if that rumor is true it implies a lot about his group of "objectivists" and the "science" behind their beliefs. You'd think the JAES would be very sympathetic. So how bad could it have been to not pass peer review? That is if it is true that he submitted a study and it was rejected.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I wouldn't know that about the JAES... - Analog Scott 17:32:18 04/03/07 (1)
- Re: I wouldn't know that about the JAES... - john curl 20:43:18 04/03/07 (0)