In Reply to: Re: where's the science? posted by Posy Rorer on April 3, 2007 at 09:40:02:
PR
"advanced audio products (aka "controversial tweaks" as they are known around these parts)"Well, controversial tweaks such as the Intelligent Chip certainly exist. But there doesn't seem to be any evidence the IC works beyond affecting perception through the biases inherent in knowing they are being used. Where's the proof they make the sound any different? What do they actually do besides cost money and just sit there?
PR
"Great, so investigate the phenomenon."Why should he, unless he's selling them or claiming they affect audio signal in a significant way? As a sensible consumer, I simply don't want to spend money or time on unproven tweaks. All my equipment has known functions and performs them quite well. My CDP plays CDs, my amplifier amplifies the line level signals input, my speakers transduce the amplifier signal into sound waves. What does the Intelligent Chip do?
This raises the question of just what phenomenon there is to be investigated. Each case must be taken individually, of course, but the same considerations apply.
____________________________________________________
"Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A not very responsive answer. - Pat D 11:09:48 04/03/07 (20)
- Re: A not very responsive answer. - Posy Rorer 15:53:56 04/03/07 (19)
- "Takes the whole fun out of audio, when you [even suspect] how it might work." LOL! Indeed... - clarkjohnsen 10:52:27 04/04/07 (3)
- It's a matter of taste and inclination. - Pat D 11:45:19 04/04/07 (2)
- Fortunately (for me), I have a *sound* technical background. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:02:53 04/05/07 (0)
- Re: It's a matter of taste and inclination. - Posy Rorer 19:21:08 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: A not very responsive answer. - Pat D 19:16:19 04/03/07 (5)
- Re: A not very responsive answer. - Posy Rorer 20:15:53 04/04/07 (4)
- Re: A not very responsive answer. - Pat D 21:27:39 04/04/07 (3)
- Re: A not very responsive answer. - Posy Rorer 10:08:42 04/05/07 (2)
- Research and development is fine, but why should I as a consumer bother with unproven products? - Pat D 13:10:58 04/05/07 (1)
- That's not very responsive, Pat. - Posy Rorer 17:28:45 04/06/07 (1)
- "But, it's not for the spineless, that I will admit". Me too. It's for the brainless. But that too requires no spine nt - AJinFLA 17:42:22 04/03/07 (0)
- "Since he asked about the phenomenon, " Where did you get that? - Analog Scott 16:50:57 04/03/07 (7)
- Re: "Since he asked about the phenomenon, " Where did you get that? - Posy Rorer 20:17:54 04/04/07 (6)
- At least you are reliable? - Analog Scott 21:29:51 04/04/07 (5)
- Re: At least you are reliable? - Posy Rorer 10:02:32 04/05/07 (4)
- "what was the question?" - Analog Scott 11:01:59 04/05/07 (3)
- Re: "what was the question?" - Posy Rorer 17:37:13 04/06/07 (2)
- still not making any sense - Analog Scott 07:27:43 04/07/07 (1)
- Re: still not making any sense - Posy Rorer 16:38:21 04/08/07 (0)