In Reply to: Re: I guess I will have to quit posted by Don T on October 26, 2006 at 00:20:28:
Here goes one more attempt to get a meeting of minds here:First off you listed all six possibilities that I listed in a slightly different format. (I assume that in the 2nd set you meant to write loseR rather than winR). This is where R represents the "Monty reveal." So far we are on the same page.
No need to go further than these 6 possibilites.
I do not understand what your next set is supposed to represent, especially the "loseR3 loseR3" that you say I did not account for. Please explain what these 3 lines are meant to represent.
What I will tell you is that if you wish to write a short computer program and actually run a simulation you will not find the 1/6 chance the winning door is revealed, you will find this chance is 1 out of 3- because there are 2 separate doors to which this 1 out of 6 chance can apply.
Let me ask a simplified question about counting possibilities. Suppose you flip a fair coin 10 times, each time writing down heads or tails. At the end of the 10 flips, what are the odds that you have exactly 2 heads and 8 tails written down?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - tunenut 07:19:05 10/26/06 (11)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 11:56:28 10/26/06 (2)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - tunenut 18:20:39 10/26/06 (1)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 23:12:00 10/26/06 (0)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 08:25:01 10/26/06 (7)
- here is your logical fallacy - tunenut 10:07:27 10/26/06 (6)
- It's still wrong. - Don T 11:41:47 10/26/06 (5)
- Please answer my three questions (NT) - tunenut 11:44:56 10/26/06 (4)
- Re: Please answer my three questions (NT) - Don T 12:04:12 10/26/06 (3)
- Re: Please answer my three questions (NT) - tunenut 12:45:51 10/26/06 (2)