In Reply to: you are close but not correct posted by tunenut on October 25, 2006 at 19:29:36:
door x - winning, losing, losing
door y - losing, winning, losing
door z - losing, losing, winningClearly each door has a 1/3 chance of winning.
However the chance that either door y or door z is the winner and is randomly selected to be revealed is only 2/6 or 1/3. But that's not what we are interested in since only one of the two can be selected, the odds are only 1/2 of that or 1/6 as I stated above that the winning door will be revealled.
The situation is very clean.
Not by your table which assumes equal probabilities of outcomes. Your numbers would be correct if the random selection process included revealing door #1 but it doesn't and this needs to be accounted for.
I hope I explained this in a clear enough fashion.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- That's not the right way to count! - Don T 21:17:10 10/25/06 (14)
- I guess I will have to quit - tunenut 21:27:20 10/25/06 (13)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 00:20:28 10/26/06 (12)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - tunenut 07:19:05 10/26/06 (11)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 11:56:28 10/26/06 (2)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - tunenut 18:20:39 10/26/06 (1)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 23:12:00 10/26/06 (0)
- Re: I guess I will have to quit - Don T 08:25:01 10/26/06 (7)
- here is your logical fallacy - tunenut 10:07:27 10/26/06 (6)
- It's still wrong. - Don T 11:41:47 10/26/06 (5)
- Please answer my three questions (NT) - tunenut 11:44:56 10/26/06 (4)
- Re: Please answer my three questions (NT) - Don T 12:04:12 10/26/06 (3)
- Re: Please answer my three questions (NT) - tunenut 12:45:51 10/26/06 (2)