In Reply to: It is interesting that anti-science focuses now only on Darwin posted by Norm on October 12, 2003 at 10:50:11:
No, the attacks (if such they be) are on the so-called scientists who adhere to an orthodoxy as rigid as any Bible-thumper's, only they don't recognize it. I have read that Darwin was intellectually honest and proposed that if the fossil record failed to support his theory, then his theory should be rejected.The carnival shell game we call modern science uses adaptation of the species to extrapolate that evolution is fact. What an insufferable gang of wankers, sez I.
But the broader implications of my original post concern audio too, don't you think? For instance, the part about Darwin's showing "a welcoming attitude toward skepticism". In audio of course the skeptics are the tweakers, who don't buy the noise/frequency-response/distortion model.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Attacking science" - clarkjohnsen 11:23:11 10/12/03 (5)
- Comment from an "insufferable wanker" - rditmars 08:26:32 10/13/03 (0)
- Re: - Superfly 15:30:42 10/12/03 (0)
- There is no question that at it root science is a faith - Norm 13:19:01 10/12/03 (2)
- Hmmmm . . . - Pat D 12:47:21 10/23/03 (0)
- Re: There is no question that at it root science is a faith - john curl 11:12:17 10/13/03 (0)