In Reply to: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... posted by dado4 on October 13, 2003 at 14:25:00:
Yes, all we have about anything is a preponderance of evidence.You say that debate over mechanisms for evolution has ceased since Origins, then immediately list three who have engaged in such debate (only to be "ridiculed," perhaps because they were wrong).
How can evolution by natural selection be falsified? With ONE OBSERVATION that is incompatible with the theory! Alternative explanations are not enough. Where are the observations from decades of research in paleontology, taxonomy, biochemistry, and genetics that are incompatible with natural selection as the primary mechanism of evolution?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - rditmars 15:06:45 10/13/03 (4)
- Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 17:04:36 10/13/03 (3)
- Well it was fun for a while.... - rditmars 18:20:29 10/13/03 (2)
- It boils down to what's comfortable doesn't it? - dado4 19:59:28 10/13/03 (1)
- Paluxy River Dinosaur footprints! - Pat D 17:38:04 10/18/03 (0)