Re: neither statement is true. - rditmars

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - "Using Darwin to teach skepticism about Darwinism" - clarkjohnsen 08:15:51 10/11/03 (46)

Ever teach science? - JCA 12:35:04 10/16/03 (1)

It's much the same in other fields. - Pat D 13:19:56 10/16/03 (0)

Re: "Using Darwin to teach skepticism about Darwinism" - middleground 06:10:22 10/12/03 (0)

Debating evolution in the classroom... - rditmars 10:32:41 10/11/03 (42)

You are pretty much correct, sir. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:52:38 10/11/03 (41)

Debate? - Superfly 07:38:21 10/12/03 (40)

Theory <> Theoretical!!! nt. - Sam M 08:53:40 10/14/03 (0)

Some late clarification - rditmars 07:54:10 10/13/03 (10)

neither statement is true. - dado4 12:14:13 10/13/03 (9)

Re: neither statement is true. - rditmars 12:57:12 10/13/03 (8)

Please be specifc..... - dado4 13:58:30 10/13/03 (0)

Ignore inadvertant post above. - rditmars 13:40:50 10/13/03 (6)

In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 14:25:00 10/13/03 (5)

Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - rditmars 15:06:45 10/13/03 (4)

Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 17:04:36 10/13/03 (3)

Well it was fun for a while.... - rditmars 18:20:29 10/13/03 (2)

It boils down to what's comfortable doesn't it? - dado4 19:59:28 10/13/03 (1)

Paluxy River Dinosaur footprints! - Pat D 17:38:04 10/18/03 (0)

Some confusion on all sides here. - dado4 17:18:50 10/12/03 (17)

You have just eliminated history. - Pat D 05:31:37 10/16/03 (16)

History is not science - dado4 11:11:48 10/16/03 (15)

You are looking for absolute proof in science. - Pat D 13:16:04 10/16/03 (14)

Science is, by definition, proof. - dado4 22:11:55 10/16/03 (13)

Natural science is not pure mathematics. - Pat D 15:57:23 10/17/03 (12)

Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - dado4 09:17:01 10/18/03 (11)

Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - Pat D 17:20:35 10/18/03 (10)

Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - dado4 20:00:33 10/18/03 (9)

Newton's Law of Gravity and the Orbit of Mercury - Pat D 21:40:20 10/25/03 (7)

Re: Newton's Law of Gravity and the Orbit of Mercury - dado4 19:57:00 10/30/03 (6)

ROFL: You contradict yourself again and again. - Pat D 10:03:07 10/31/03 (5)

I am not seeing this. - dado4 14:53:00 11/01/03 (4)

Did the sun rise millions of years ago? - Pat D 21:22:32 11/01/03 (3)

What are we arguing here? - dado4 07:56:07 11/02/03 (2)

Re: What are we arguing here? - jeff mai 00:35:06 11/03/03 (0)

GMAB - Pat D 12:21:31 11/02/03 (0)

Did the sun rise in the distant past? - Pat D 16:49:02 10/19/03 (0)

"You cannot debate fact." What's a fact? - clarkjohnsen 11:26:26 10/12/03 (1)

What's a fact? - jensw 23:58:44 10/12/03 (0)

It is interesting that anti-science focuses now only on Darwin - Norm 10:50:11 10/12/03 (6)

"Attacking science" - clarkjohnsen 11:23:11 10/12/03 (5)

Comment from an "insufferable wanker" - rditmars 08:26:32 10/13/03 (0)

Re: - Superfly 15:30:42 10/12/03 (0)

There is no question that at it root science is a faith - Norm 13:19:01 10/12/03 (2)

Hmmmm . . . - Pat D 12:47:21 10/23/03 (0)

Re: There is no question that at it root science is a faith - john curl 11:12:17 10/13/03 (0)

blasphemy that is...nt - Superfly 10:11:25 10/12/03 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: neither statement is true. - rditmars 12:57:12 10/13/03 (8)

Please be specifc..... - dado4 13:58:30 10/13/03 (0)

Ignore inadvertant post above. - rditmars 13:40:50 10/13/03 (6)

In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 14:25:00 10/13/03 (5)

Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - rditmars 15:06:45 10/13/03 (4)

Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 17:04:36 10/13/03 (3)

Well it was fun for a while.... - rditmars 18:20:29 10/13/03 (2)

It boils down to what's comfortable doesn't it? - dado4 19:59:28 10/13/03 (1)

Paluxy River Dinosaur footprints! - Pat D 17:38:04 10/18/03 (0)