Here's a short meditation on how science education has been turned into rigid orthodoxy -- without reference to audio, of course!clark
----------------------------------------------------------------
A glance at the 2003 issue of the Journal of Interdisciplinary
Studies: Using Darwin to teach skepticism about DarwinismThe Chronicle of Higher Education: Magazine & journal reader
Friday, October 10, 2003
In The Origin of Species, Charles Darwin wrote: "This whole volume is
one long argument." Science educators should follow that line of
thinking in teaching the theory of evolution, says John Angus
Campbell, a professor of communication at the University of Memphis.
Students in the humanities are encouraged to doubt, question, and
think critically about the theories presented to them, and so should
students in the sciences, Mr. Campbell says. "The point, after all, of
science education in a democracy is not to convince students of the
truth of current scientific theories, but to teach them what they are,
and why they are current, and by sharpening student minds through
argument, qualify students, as citizens and future scientists, to
judge and see possible alternatives," he writes.
It is "impossible to teach Darwin's theory in some parts of the
country at all," he says, because those who teach the theory do not
follow Darwin's method of presenting the material. In his writing,
Darwin is not dogmatic but shows "a welcoming attitude toward
skepticism," Mr. Campbell says.
Science educators should also welcome skepticism, argument, and
debate, he writes, because "not by information alone, but by
information presented through two-sided argument are minds prepared
for reasoned choice."
The article, "The Educational Debate Over Darwinism," is not online.
Information about the journal, which is published by the International
Christian Studies Association, is available at
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - "Using Darwin to teach skepticism about Darwinism" - clarkjohnsen 08:15:51 10/11/03 (46)
- Ever teach science? - JCA 12:35:04 10/16/03 (1)
- It's much the same in other fields. - Pat D 13:19:56 10/16/03 (0)
- Re: "Using Darwin to teach skepticism about Darwinism" - middleground 06:10:22 10/12/03 (0)
- Debating evolution in the classroom... - rditmars 10:32:41 10/11/03 (42)
- You are pretty much correct, sir. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:52:38 10/11/03 (41)
- Debate? - Superfly 07:38:21 10/12/03 (40)
- Theory <> Theoretical!!! nt. - Sam M 08:53:40 10/14/03 (0)
- Some late clarification - rditmars 07:54:10 10/13/03 (10)
- neither statement is true. - dado4 12:14:13 10/13/03 (9)
- Re: neither statement is true. - rditmars 12:57:12 10/13/03 (8)
- Please be specifc..... - dado4 13:58:30 10/13/03 (0)
- Ignore inadvertant post above. - rditmars 13:40:50 10/13/03 (6)
- In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 14:25:00 10/13/03 (5)
- Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - rditmars 15:06:45 10/13/03 (4)
- Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 17:04:36 10/13/03 (3)
- Well it was fun for a while.... - rditmars 18:20:29 10/13/03 (2)
- It boils down to what's comfortable doesn't it? - dado4 19:59:28 10/13/03 (1)
- Paluxy River Dinosaur footprints! - Pat D 17:38:04 10/18/03 (0)
- Some confusion on all sides here. - dado4 17:18:50 10/12/03 (17)
- You have just eliminated history. - Pat D 05:31:37 10/16/03 (16)
- History is not science - dado4 11:11:48 10/16/03 (15)
- You are looking for absolute proof in science. - Pat D 13:16:04 10/16/03 (14)
- Science is, by definition, proof. - dado4 22:11:55 10/16/03 (13)
- Natural science is not pure mathematics. - Pat D 15:57:23 10/17/03 (12)
- Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - dado4 09:17:01 10/18/03 (11)
- Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - Pat D 17:20:35 10/18/03 (10)
- Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - dado4 20:00:33 10/18/03 (9)
- Newton's Law of Gravity and the Orbit of Mercury - Pat D 21:40:20 10/25/03 (7)
- Re: Newton's Law of Gravity and the Orbit of Mercury - dado4 19:57:00 10/30/03 (6)
- ROFL: You contradict yourself again and again. - Pat D 10:03:07 10/31/03 (5)
- I am not seeing this. - dado4 14:53:00 11/01/03 (4)
- Did the sun rise millions of years ago? - Pat D 21:22:32 11/01/03 (3)
- What are we arguing here? - dado4 07:56:07 11/02/03 (2)
- Re: What are we arguing here? - jeff mai 00:35:06 11/03/03 (0)
- GMAB - Pat D 12:21:31 11/02/03 (0)
- Did the sun rise in the distant past? - Pat D 16:49:02 10/19/03 (0)
- "You cannot debate fact." What's a fact? - clarkjohnsen 11:26:26 10/12/03 (1)
- What's a fact? - jensw 23:58:44 10/12/03 (0)
- It is interesting that anti-science focuses now only on Darwin - Norm 10:50:11 10/12/03 (6)
- "Attacking science" - clarkjohnsen 11:23:11 10/12/03 (5)
- Comment from an "insufferable wanker" - rditmars 08:26:32 10/13/03 (0)
- Re: - Superfly 15:30:42 10/12/03 (0)
- There is no question that at it root science is a faith - Norm 13:19:01 10/12/03 (2)
- Hmmmm . . . - Pat D 12:47:21 10/23/03 (0)
- Re: There is no question that at it root science is a faith - john curl 11:12:17 10/13/03 (0)
- blasphemy that is...nt - Superfly 10:11:25 10/12/03 (0)