In Reply to: You are pretty much correct, sir. nt posted by clarkjohnsen on October 11, 2003 at 11:52:38:
Teaching Darwin as THEORY just goes to show...how far science will go to pacify the religiously nuts.
DEBATE??
It's Prima Facia...You cannot debate fact.
The Bible doesn't have to be taken literally. 7 days doesn't have to mean 7 days people...and GOD can create man through evolution...
I suppose there were HISTORIANS in the Garden of Eden right??...
taking notes for the Bible.
and Noah's Ark was HUGE.
and...
Forget it; It was a big puff of smoke, OK?
Darwin MUST be in Hell for blastfamy.
SF
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Debate? - Superfly 07:38:21 10/12/03 (40)
- Theory <> Theoretical!!! nt. - Sam M 08:53:40 10/14/03 (0)
- Some late clarification - rditmars 07:54:10 10/13/03 (10)
- neither statement is true. - dado4 12:14:13 10/13/03 (9)
- Re: neither statement is true. - rditmars 12:57:12 10/13/03 (8)
- Please be specifc..... - dado4 13:58:30 10/13/03 (0)
- Ignore inadvertant post above. - rditmars 13:40:50 10/13/03 (6)
- In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 14:25:00 10/13/03 (5)
- Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - rditmars 15:06:45 10/13/03 (4)
- Re: In the case of an unfalsifiable premise... - dado4 17:04:36 10/13/03 (3)
- Well it was fun for a while.... - rditmars 18:20:29 10/13/03 (2)
- It boils down to what's comfortable doesn't it? - dado4 19:59:28 10/13/03 (1)
- Paluxy River Dinosaur footprints! - Pat D 17:38:04 10/18/03 (0)
- Some confusion on all sides here. - dado4 17:18:50 10/12/03 (17)
- You have just eliminated history. - Pat D 05:31:37 10/16/03 (16)
- History is not science - dado4 11:11:48 10/16/03 (15)
- You are looking for absolute proof in science. - Pat D 13:16:04 10/16/03 (14)
- Science is, by definition, proof. - dado4 22:11:55 10/16/03 (13)
- Natural science is not pure mathematics. - Pat D 15:57:23 10/17/03 (12)
- Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - dado4 09:17:01 10/18/03 (11)
- Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - Pat D 17:20:35 10/18/03 (10)
- Re: Natural science is not pure mathematics. - dado4 20:00:33 10/18/03 (9)
- Newton's Law of Gravity and the Orbit of Mercury - Pat D 21:40:20 10/25/03 (7)
- Re: Newton's Law of Gravity and the Orbit of Mercury - dado4 19:57:00 10/30/03 (6)
- ROFL: You contradict yourself again and again. - Pat D 10:03:07 10/31/03 (5)
- I am not seeing this. - dado4 14:53:00 11/01/03 (4)
- Did the sun rise millions of years ago? - Pat D 21:22:32 11/01/03 (3)
- What are we arguing here? - dado4 07:56:07 11/02/03 (2)
- Re: What are we arguing here? - jeff mai 00:35:06 11/03/03 (0)
- GMAB - Pat D 12:21:31 11/02/03 (0)
- Did the sun rise in the distant past? - Pat D 16:49:02 10/19/03 (0)
- "You cannot debate fact." What's a fact? - clarkjohnsen 11:26:26 10/12/03 (1)
- What's a fact? - jensw 23:58:44 10/12/03 (0)
- It is interesting that anti-science focuses now only on Darwin - Norm 10:50:11 10/12/03 (6)
- "Attacking science" - clarkjohnsen 11:23:11 10/12/03 (5)
- Comment from an "insufferable wanker" - rditmars 08:26:32 10/13/03 (0)
- Re: - Superfly 15:30:42 10/12/03 (0)
- There is no question that at it root science is a faith - Norm 13:19:01 10/12/03 (2)
- Hmmmm . . . - Pat D 12:47:21 10/23/03 (0)
- Re: There is no question that at it root science is a faith - john curl 11:12:17 10/13/03 (0)
- blasphemy that is...nt - Superfly 10:11:25 10/12/03 (0)