In Reply to: Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin posted by jamesgarvin on May 3, 2007 at 11:07:12:
>You wrote that Gallo never sent a sample. As I wrote below, that
>could be because Wes decided he did not want to review them, in
>which case they would not send a sample, or it could be because they
>themselves did not elect to send a sample. I simply attempting to
>determine the reason.
I don't know the reason, nor do I think it important enough to find
out. Things like this happen all the time. End of story, as far as
I am concerned.
>I think when someone breaks an agreement, their integrity is
>questioned.
There was no formal "agreement." Your point is moot. Again, end of
story as far as I am concerned.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 11:23:52 05/03/07 (1)
- I am convinced that this is Mr. Garvin's first - Bruce Kendall 11:36:03 05/03/07 (0)