My point exactly--please the manufacturer or you're cut off. What good is that to a reader? nt

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - I think Dr. Evil stole Stereomojo's mojo - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 07:40:34 04/28/07 (81)

If you cynics could just be objective for a moment you'd realize Stereomojo is performing a valuable service... - bjh 08:46:02 04/30/07 (0)

It wasn't a review, really... nt - clarkjohnsen 13:35:57 04/28/07 (0)

Whew. (nt) - Dave Pogue 11:58:28 04/28/07 (2)

Could you bring yourself to read the whole thing? [nt] - Ted Smith 15:08:48 04/28/07 (1)

Yeah, I did. - Dave Pogue 16:33:00 04/28/07 (0)

Unfortunately... - mkuller 11:35:22 04/28/07 (75)

Mr. Kuller et al... - jdarby 06:14:18 05/03/07 (5)

Took me a few days to finally come up with something, but.... - Sue Kraft 23:33:41 05/06/07 (0)

Anybody else?? Yes? No? - Well,..... - rlw 09:34:28 05/05/07 (0)

As long as we're being snippy ... - Dave Pogue 07:21:07 05/05/07 (1)

Nothing in the review to suggest that ability either. - sjb 16:53:38 05/05/07 (0)

Whooo, Darby... - mkuller 10:25:07 05/03/07 (0)

We are not worthy! - Elmo 05:46:17 04/29/07 (4)

Hmmm...did you respond ot the AA post and you're writing for mojo now? (NT) - mkuller 13:22:52 04/30/07 (1)

All wet and still lookie wudd popped up ..... - Elmo 05:47:54 05/01/07 (0)

Re: We are not worthy! - Kloss 07:48:05 04/29/07 (1)

Weeaimtuhpleeze - Elmo 09:40:24 04/29/07 (1)

Huh? - Rick W 12:47:42 04/28/07 (63)

Re: Huh? - TomLarson 13:59:00 04/28/07 (62)

On the other hand.... - jamesgarvin 19:08:02 04/29/07 (41)

Re: On the other hand.... - TomLarson 19:33:08 04/29/07 (40)

Well, let's look at the timeline.... - jamesgarvin 10:04:24 04/30/07 (39)

Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... - John Atkinson 13:16:47 05/01/07 (35)

Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... - jamesgarvin 15:49:57 05/01/07 (34)

Why don't you send Wes a note and ask him to explain what he wrote? - Rob Doorack 11:28:16 05/02/07 (3)

Re: Why don't you send Wes a note and ask him to explain what he wrote? - John Atkinson 13:52:45 05/03/07 (2)

Re: Why don't you send Wes a note and ask him to explain what he wrote? - john curl 18:09:04 05/04/07 (1)

Don't worry about it... - bjh 12:28:02 05/07/07 (0)

Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 04:31:03 05/02/07 (27)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 07:54:42 05/02/07 (26)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 13:50:49 05/02/07 (9)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 15:08:43 05/02/07 (8)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 07:21:00 05/03/07 (3)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 11:07:12 05/03/07 (2)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 11:23:52 05/03/07 (1)

I am convinced that this is Mr. Garvin's first - Bruce Kendall 11:36:03 05/03/07 (0)

Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - Avocat 19:33:44 05/02/07 (1)

Uhh... - Charles Hansen 19:42:24 05/02/07 (0)

I really don't understand it... - Charles Hansen 16:32:05 05/02/07 (1)

Re: I really don't understand it... - jamesgarvin 10:25:29 05/03/07 (0)

I can't believe this issue is so traumatic for you. - Bruce Kendall 11:50:20 05/02/07 (6)

Re: I can't believe this issue is so traumatic for you. - jamesgarvin 15:15:13 05/02/07 (5)

Because the issue causing you all of this grief is far more anal than that. - Bruce Kendall 15:53:30 05/02/07 (4)

Re: Because the issue causing you all of this grief is far more anal than that. - jamesgarvin 10:32:07 05/03/07 (3)

Charles provided the most logical explanation possible. - Bruce Kendall 10:56:58 05/03/07 (2)

Re: Charles provided the most logical explanation possible. - jamesgarvin 13:54:44 05/03/07 (1)

Well gosh, I guess this proves you're right. - Bruce Kendall 14:15:34 05/03/07 (0)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 08:35:02 05/02/07 (8)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 08:58:06 05/02/07 (7)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 12:55:48 05/02/07 (6)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 15:31:52 05/02/07 (5)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 16:05:03 05/02/07 (4)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 10:35:04 05/03/07 (1)

Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Sundried 22:06:29 05/05/07 (0)

I didn't know there were so many people who woke up in the morning, - Bruce Kendall 16:09:26 05/02/07 (1)

Re: I didn't know there were so many people who woke up in the morning, - TomLarson 21:01:25 05/02/07 (0)

Re: Who made the mistake? - Charles Hansen 19:11:16 05/01/07 (1)

Re: Who made the mistake? - jamesgarvin 08:10:34 05/02/07 (0)

the 18 month timeline - jdouglas51 14:01:34 04/30/07 (0)

Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... - TomLarson 11:02:07 04/30/07 (1)

Enough already... - John Atkinson 06:34:29 05/02/07 (1)

You're entitled, but I disagree. - Rick W 09:04:28 04/29/07 (17)

Re: You're entitled, but I disagree. - TomLarson 09:31:36 04/29/07 (16)

Ahh, you ought to check facts before you type. - Rick W 11:27:24 04/29/07 (2)

Re: Ahh, you ought to check facts before you type. - TomLarson 16:10:07 04/29/07 (1)

Re: Ahh, you ought to check facts before you type. - jdouglas51 14:06:05 04/30/07 (0)

Here is one reason why most reviews are postive & still readable - AmanteDiMusica 11:07:38 04/29/07 (12)

Re: Here is one reason why most reviews are postive & still readable - Posy Rorer 09:44:44 04/30/07 (0)

My point exactly--please the manufacturer or you're cut off. What good is that to a reader? nt - TomLarson 11:12:36 04/29/07 (10)

Most of the reviews I read take the time - Bruce Kendall 11:47:59 04/29/07 (9)

Re: Most of the reviews I read take the time - TomLarson 16:05:27 04/29/07 (8)

Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - Bruce Kendall 16:24:12 04/29/07 (7)

Re: Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - TomLarson 18:13:12 04/29/07 (6)

In a nutshell - Bruce Kendall 11:17:04 04/30/07 (0)

Your points aren't news. - Rick W 19:20:49 04/29/07 (2)

the reviews aren't news. - jdouglas51 14:11:08 04/30/07 (0)

Re: Your points aren't news. - TomLarson 19:26:18 04/29/07 (0)

Polk... - David Clark 18:23:47 04/29/07 (1)

Re: Polk... - TomLarson 19:28:37 04/29/07 (0)

it takes a lot of reading - hifitommy 18:57:07 04/28/07 (1)

Re: it takes a lot of reading - TomLarson 21:38:49 04/28/07 (0)

Follow Ups

My point exactly--please the manufacturer or you're cut off. What good is that to a reader? nt - TomLarson 11:12:36 04/29/07 (10)

Most of the reviews I read take the time - Bruce Kendall 11:47:59 04/29/07 (9)

Re: Most of the reviews I read take the time - TomLarson 16:05:27 04/29/07 (8)

Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - Bruce Kendall 16:24:12 04/29/07 (7)

Re: Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - TomLarson 18:13:12 04/29/07 (6)

In a nutshell - Bruce Kendall 11:17:04 04/30/07 (0)

Your points aren't news. - Rick W 19:20:49 04/29/07 (2)

the reviews aren't news. - jdouglas51 14:11:08 04/30/07 (0)

Re: Your points aren't news. - TomLarson 19:26:18 04/29/07 (0)

Polk... - David Clark 18:23:47 04/29/07 (1)

Re: Polk... - TomLarson 19:28:37 04/29/07 (0)

Post a Message!