In Reply to: My point exactly--please the manufacturer or you're cut off. What good is that to a reader? nt posted by TomLarson on April 29, 2007 at 11:12:36:
to point out a product's shortcomings as well as where it might work the best. That is one of the challenges of the reviewer's job. This isn't a one-size-fits-all hobby.What is it some of us expect? A total and complete thrashing of a product because it serves no purpose or application whatsoever? First point out the moron who would spend money to bring such a worthless item to market in the first place.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Most of the reviews I read take the time - Bruce Kendall 11:47:59 04/29/07 (9)
- Re: Most of the reviews I read take the time - TomLarson 16:05:27 04/29/07 (8)
- Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - Bruce Kendall 16:24:12 04/29/07 (7)
- Re: Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - TomLarson 18:13:12 04/29/07 (6)
- In a nutshell - Bruce Kendall 11:17:04 04/30/07 (0)
- Your points aren't news. - Rick W 19:20:49 04/29/07 (2)
- the reviews aren't news. - jdouglas51 14:11:08 04/30/07 (0)
- Re: Your points aren't news. - TomLarson 19:26:18 04/29/07 (0)
- Polk... - David Clark 18:23:47 04/29/07 (1)
- Re: Polk... - TomLarson 19:28:37 04/29/07 (0)