In Reply to: Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... posted by jamesgarvin on May 1, 2007 at 15:49:57:
>>As I have told you before, Mr. Garvin, Wes never did receive a pair
>>of Reference 3.1s for review in Stereophile.
>>
>>No mystery, as he never had the speakers. As I have now told you
>>several times.
>
>The mystery to which I refer is why the reviewer is writing they are
>in his queue, and that he will be taking a look at them, and then the
>editor is writing that he never had them.
With respect, you seem hard of thinking, Mr. Garvin. By "queue," Wes
meant that they were on his list of components to request for review,
not that they were physically present in his home. If he _had_
eventually received the Gallos, he would have reviewed them, but he
didn't, as I have repeatedly and patiently explained to you.
By ignoring my explanations and continuing to insist that there was
something fishy going on, you appear to be calling me a liar, Mr.
Garvin, something that doesn't sit well with me.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 04:31:03 05/02/07 (27)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 07:54:42 05/02/07 (26)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 13:50:49 05/02/07 (9)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 15:08:43 05/02/07 (8)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 07:21:00 05/03/07 (3)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 11:07:12 05/03/07 (2)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 11:23:52 05/03/07 (1)
- I am convinced that this is Mr. Garvin's first - Bruce Kendall 11:36:03 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - Avocat 19:33:44 05/02/07 (1)
- Uhh... - Charles Hansen 19:42:24 05/02/07 (0)
- I really don't understand it... - Charles Hansen 16:32:05 05/02/07 (1)
- Re: I really don't understand it... - jamesgarvin 10:25:29 05/03/07 (0)
- I can't believe this issue is so traumatic for you. - Bruce Kendall 11:50:20 05/02/07 (6)
- Re: I can't believe this issue is so traumatic for you. - jamesgarvin 15:15:13 05/02/07 (5)
- Because the issue causing you all of this grief is far more anal than that. - Bruce Kendall 15:53:30 05/02/07 (4)
- Re: Because the issue causing you all of this grief is far more anal than that. - jamesgarvin 10:32:07 05/03/07 (3)
- Charles provided the most logical explanation possible. - Bruce Kendall 10:56:58 05/03/07 (2)
- Re: Charles provided the most logical explanation possible. - jamesgarvin 13:54:44 05/03/07 (1)
- Well gosh, I guess this proves you're right. - Bruce Kendall 14:15:34 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 08:35:02 05/02/07 (8)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 08:58:06 05/02/07 (7)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 12:55:48 05/02/07 (6)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 15:31:52 05/02/07 (5)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 16:05:03 05/02/07 (4)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 10:35:04 05/03/07 (1)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Sundried 22:06:29 05/05/07 (0)
- I didn't know there were so many people who woke up in the morning, - Bruce Kendall 16:09:26 05/02/07 (1)
- Re: I didn't know there were so many people who woke up in the morning, - TomLarson 21:01:25 05/02/07 (0)