![]() |
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... posted by TomLarson on April 30, 2007 at 11:02:07:
>It would be VERY interesting to know what happened at Stereophile re
>Gallo.
_Nothing_ happened, Mr. Larson. James Garvin misunderstood what he read
but has refused to accept that he was in error. Wes Phillips never
received review samples of the Gallo speaker, hence no review was
published in Stereophile.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - I think Dr. Evil stole Stereomojo's mojo - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 07:40:34 04/28/07 (81)
- If you cynics could just be objective for a moment you'd realize Stereomojo is performing a valuable service... - bjh 08:46:02 04/30/07 (0)
- It wasn't a review, really... nt - clarkjohnsen 13:35:57 04/28/07 (0)
- Whew. (nt) - Dave Pogue 11:58:28 04/28/07 (2)
- Could you bring yourself to read the whole thing? [nt] - Ted Smith 15:08:48 04/28/07 (1)
- Yeah, I did. - Dave Pogue 16:33:00 04/28/07 (0)
- Unfortunately... - mkuller 11:35:22 04/28/07 (75)
- Mr. Kuller et al... - jdarby 06:14:18 05/03/07 (5)
- Took me a few days to finally come up with something, but.... - Sue Kraft 23:33:41 05/06/07 (0)
- Anybody else?? Yes? No? - Well,..... - rlw 09:34:28 05/05/07 (0)
- As long as we're being snippy ... - Dave Pogue 07:21:07 05/05/07 (1)
- Nothing in the review to suggest that ability either. - sjb 16:53:38 05/05/07 (0)
- Whooo, Darby... - mkuller 10:25:07 05/03/07 (0)
- We are not worthy! - Elmo 05:46:17 04/29/07 (4)
- Hmmm...did you respond ot the AA post and you're writing for mojo now? (NT) - mkuller 13:22:52 04/30/07 (1)
- All wet and still lookie wudd popped up ..... - Elmo 05:47:54 05/01/07 (0)
- Re: We are not worthy! - Kloss 07:48:05 04/29/07 (1)
- Weeaimtuhpleeze - Elmo 09:40:24 04/29/07 (1)
- Huh? - Rick W 12:47:42 04/28/07 (63)
- Re: Huh? - TomLarson 13:59:00 04/28/07 (62)
- On the other hand.... - jamesgarvin 19:08:02 04/29/07 (41)
- Re: On the other hand.... - TomLarson 19:33:08 04/29/07 (40)
- Well, let's look at the timeline.... - jamesgarvin 10:04:24 04/30/07 (39)
- Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... - John Atkinson 13:16:47 05/01/07 (35)
- Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... - jamesgarvin 15:49:57 05/01/07 (34)
- Why don't you send Wes a note and ask him to explain what he wrote? - Rob Doorack 11:28:16 05/02/07 (3)
- Re: Why don't you send Wes a note and ask him to explain what he wrote? - John Atkinson 13:52:45 05/03/07 (2)
- Re: Why don't you send Wes a note and ask him to explain what he wrote? - john curl 18:09:04 05/04/07 (1)
- Don't worry about it... - bjh 12:28:02 05/07/07 (0)
- Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 04:31:03 05/02/07 (27)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 07:54:42 05/02/07 (26)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 13:50:49 05/02/07 (9)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 15:08:43 05/02/07 (8)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 07:21:00 05/03/07 (3)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 11:07:12 05/03/07 (2)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 11:23:52 05/03/07 (1)
- I am convinced that this is Mr. Garvin's first - Bruce Kendall 11:36:03 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - Avocat 19:33:44 05/02/07 (1)
- Uhh... - Charles Hansen 19:42:24 05/02/07 (0)
- I really don't understand it... - Charles Hansen 16:32:05 05/02/07 (1)
- Re: I really don't understand it... - jamesgarvin 10:25:29 05/03/07 (0)
- I can't believe this issue is so traumatic for you. - Bruce Kendall 11:50:20 05/02/07 (6)
- Re: I can't believe this issue is so traumatic for you. - jamesgarvin 15:15:13 05/02/07 (5)
- Because the issue causing you all of this grief is far more anal than that. - Bruce Kendall 15:53:30 05/02/07 (4)
- Re: Because the issue causing you all of this grief is far more anal than that. - jamesgarvin 10:32:07 05/03/07 (3)
- Charles provided the most logical explanation possible. - Bruce Kendall 10:56:58 05/03/07 (2)
- Re: Charles provided the most logical explanation possible. - jamesgarvin 13:54:44 05/03/07 (1)
- Well gosh, I guess this proves you're right. - Bruce Kendall 14:15:34 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 08:35:02 05/02/07 (8)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 08:58:06 05/02/07 (7)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 12:55:48 05/02/07 (6)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 15:31:52 05/02/07 (5)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Charles Hansen 16:05:03 05/02/07 (4)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - jamesgarvin 10:35:04 05/03/07 (1)
- Re: If Mr. Atkinson won't, I will - Sundried 22:06:29 05/05/07 (0)
- I didn't know there were so many people who woke up in the morning, - Bruce Kendall 16:09:26 05/02/07 (1)
- Re: I didn't know there were so many people who woke up in the morning, - TomLarson 21:01:25 05/02/07 (0)
- Re: Who made the mistake? - Charles Hansen 19:11:16 05/01/07 (1)
- Re: Who made the mistake? - jamesgarvin 08:10:34 05/02/07 (0)
- the 18 month timeline - jdouglas51 14:01:34 04/30/07 (0)
- Re: Well, let's look at the timeline.... - TomLarson 11:02:07 04/30/07 (1)
- Enough already... - John Atkinson 06:34:29 05/02/07 (1)
- You're entitled, but I disagree. - Rick W 09:04:28 04/29/07 (17)
- Re: You're entitled, but I disagree. - TomLarson 09:31:36 04/29/07 (16)
- Ahh, you ought to check facts before you type. - Rick W 11:27:24 04/29/07 (2)
- Re: Ahh, you ought to check facts before you type. - TomLarson 16:10:07 04/29/07 (1)
- Re: Ahh, you ought to check facts before you type. - jdouglas51 14:06:05 04/30/07 (0)
- Here is one reason why most reviews are postive & still readable - AmanteDiMusica 11:07:38 04/29/07 (12)
- Re: Here is one reason why most reviews are postive & still readable - Posy Rorer 09:44:44 04/30/07 (0)
- My point exactly--please the manufacturer or you're cut off. What good is that to a reader? nt - TomLarson 11:12:36 04/29/07 (10)
- Most of the reviews I read take the time - Bruce Kendall 11:47:59 04/29/07 (9)
- Re: Most of the reviews I read take the time - TomLarson 16:05:27 04/29/07 (8)
- Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - Bruce Kendall 16:24:12 04/29/07 (7)
- Re: Polk only has their high-end stuff submitted for review. - TomLarson 18:13:12 04/29/07 (6)
- In a nutshell - Bruce Kendall 11:17:04 04/30/07 (0)
- Your points aren't news. - Rick W 19:20:49 04/29/07 (2)
- the reviews aren't news. - jdouglas51 14:11:08 04/30/07 (0)
- Re: Your points aren't news. - TomLarson 19:26:18 04/29/07 (0)
- Polk... - David Clark 18:23:47 04/29/07 (1)
- Re: Polk... - TomLarson 19:28:37 04/29/07 (0)
- it takes a lot of reading - hifitommy 18:57:07 04/28/07 (1)
- Re: it takes a lot of reading - TomLarson 21:38:49 04/28/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Enough already... - John Atkinson 06:34:29 05/02/07 (1)