In Reply to: Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin posted by jamesgarvin on May 2, 2007 at 07:54:42:
>>By ignoring my explanations and continuing to insist that there was
>>something fishy going on, you appear to be calling me a liar, Mr.
>>Garvin, something that doesn't sit well with me."
>
>I never ignored your explanation.
So why are you _still_ bringing this issue up, in an unrelated thread?
>But you confuse a cursory statement with an explanation.
It wasn't a cursory statement. It was a clear expression of the
_fact_ that Wes never received review samples of the Gallo speakers,
and _that_ was the reason Stereophile did not publish a review. Why
that wasn't the end of the matter when I first explained it you is
beyond my imagining.
>You do not dispute that Wes wrote what he wrote, nor do you dispute
>that my interpretation of what he wrote is not a reasonable
>interpretation.
It may not have been unreasonable but as I explained to you several
times now, your interpretation was wrong. Incorrect. Erroneous. Why
you continue to insist that you are right is rather sad, in my
opinion.
>Wes said he was going to do something that he was apparently not
>capable of doing.
Perhaps Wes didn't followup on his original request (he certainly has
written many reviews for Stereophile since that time and his schedule
is currently full until the end of the year); perhaps he did followup,
but Gallo felt a review in Stereophile would not be in their best
interest; why does it matter to you? Why does it matter enough, in
fact, that you keep bringing this matter up on multiple Internet
forums and implying that Stereophile has behaved in an underhanded
manner?
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 13:50:49 05/02/07 (9)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 15:08:43 05/02/07 (8)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 07:21:00 05/03/07 (3)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - jamesgarvin 11:07:12 05/03/07 (2)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - John Atkinson 11:23:52 05/03/07 (1)
- I am convinced that this is Mr. Garvin's first - Bruce Kendall 11:36:03 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: Give it a rest, Mr. Garvin - Avocat 19:33:44 05/02/07 (1)
- Uhh... - Charles Hansen 19:42:24 05/02/07 (0)
- I really don't understand it... - Charles Hansen 16:32:05 05/02/07 (1)
- Re: I really don't understand it... - jamesgarvin 10:25:29 05/03/07 (0)