In Reply to: Logical fallacy posted by geoffkait on November 23, 2022 at 13:24:57:
"No, it's not at all like that. It's just a reality you are just being stubborn about accepting." " A real skeptic, a real scientist, would roll up his sleeves and try to see what this directionality business is all about."
That encapsulates the error in your assumption.
You assume i have not looked at this, have not done null tests with speaker cables with music, have not had to make things work regardless of the operators mindset.
The last sentence may apply here as there is a whole category of "audio accessories" which the purchasers say have a positive effect and yet the same devices are often inaudible when the listener doesn't also know which cable or knob or what ever change has been made (aka blind).
These things tend to be harmless functionally speaking but have an exotic story, cost more than one would expect and reminds me of go-fast aftermarket car parts from a 1970's catalogue. Yes a chrome air filter cover is smoother aerodynamically but it doesn't actually increase HP.
For sure, if you make a change that people without prior knowledge identify above the "odds" as better then you have an improvement, if that impression holds with different kinds of music and tastes, that is a real improvement.
Now,none of this really matters in the home exactly what improves the listening experience as BOTH what enters your two ear holes AND what you know AND see is what makes up our conscious "3D hearing experience".
It matters most if your designing speakers that others will use where they don't know what was involved and you didn't know what type of music they will play.
Happy Thanksgiving
Enjoy a unique and leisurely Utube after dinner travel video with "Hobo Shoestring"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Logical fallacy exactly - tomservo 07:18:01 11/24/22 (25)
- RE: Logical fallacy exactly - Pat D 19:36:14 12/03/22 (1)
- RE: Logical fallacy exactly - geoffkait 04:29:07 12/04/22 (0)
- The logical fallacy is yours not mine - geoffkait 09:16:26 11/24/22 (22)
- Sigh, you are in over your head Geoff, would take a BIG man for YOU to admit you are wrong~nT - Cleantimestream 17:35:50 12/05/22 (5)
- he's never wrong? He didn't know Kyiv was the new name for Kiev - Story 05:28:16 12/06/22 (1)
- The Peanut Gallery speaks out. - geoffkait 06:12:46 12/06/22 (0)
- I haven't been wrong since 1985, Mr. War College Smarty Pants - geoffkait 05:12:35 12/06/22 (2)
- RE: I haven't been wrong since 1985, Mr. War College Smarty Pants - Cleantimestream 10:34:26 02/03/23 (1)
- You can't break out of your own reality firewall. nt - geoffkait 13:03:14 02/08/23 (0)
- RE: The logical fallacy is yours not mine - tomservo 07:14:25 11/25/22 (15)
- Once a pseudo skeptic...- - geoffkait 12:50:47 11/25/22 (14)
- RE: Once a pseudo skeptic...- - tomservo 07:28:03 12/07/22 (7)
- There you go again - geoffkait 09:49:28 12/07/22 (6)
- RE: There you go again - tomservo 06:45:01 12/08/22 (5)
- I'll show you mine if you show me yours - geoffkait 10:35:29 12/08/22 (4)
- RE: I'll show you mine if you show me yours - sony6060 02:16:58 07/23/23 (1)
- RE: I'll show you mine if you show me yours - geoffkait 03:55:40 07/23/23 (0)
- RE: I'll show you mine if you show me yours - sony6060 15:22:55 01/11/23 (1)
- Negative results of listening tests - geoffkait 06:20:24 01/12/23 (0)
- RE: Once a pseudo skeptic...- - Pat D 19:42:06 12/03/22 (1)
- RE: Once a pseudo skeptic...- - geoffkait 04:15:27 12/04/22 (0)
- RE: Once a pseudo skeptic...- - sony6060 19:29:12 11/27/22 (3)
- RE: Once a pseudo skeptic...- - geoffkait 04:24:06 11/28/22 (2)
- RE: Once a pseudo skeptic...- - Tre' 18:44:07 12/18/22 (1)
- Were you high when you wrote that? - geoffkait 15:03:27 12/19/22 (0)