In Reply to: "I know people who would consider any reduction in audio quality as unacceptable." posted by Analog Scott on May 17, 2007 at 14:01:00:
> Nope. whatever is better is better even if the prefered version is less than optimal.You're imposing your personal view of how things should be on everyone. Re-read my original sentence. I acknowledged a range of opinions that ran from A to Z. At one end was the one you took issue with with your apparent notion that no one could possibly think that. At the other end were people who would tolerate a horridly degraded LP just because it was an LP.
I've certainly seen a wide range of opinions on many subjects on Audioasylum. Don't say I agree with them all but I certain acknowledge they exist.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "I know people who would consider any reduction in audio quality as unacceptable." - mls-stl 14:15:28 05/17/07 (2)
- Re: "I know people who would consider any reduction in audio quality as unacceptable." - Analog Scott 15:17:25 05/17/07 (1)
- Re: You seem to want the last word; consider it yours. nt. - mls-stl 20:09:02 05/17/07 (0)