Ahh, that's the slippery PatD we're used to...

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - thetubeguy1954 12:10:31 04/19/07 (64)

Same thing that constitutes an accurate rendering of a musical score? nt - clarkjohnsen 08:49:48 04/20/07 (0)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - beermanpete@socal.rr.com 21:01:03 04/19/07 (9)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - thetubeguy1954 06:53:21 04/20/07 (8)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - beermanpete@socal.rr.com 20:16:49 04/20/07 (5)

So, who are you guys to decide what people "should aspire to?" - Pat D 10:42:30 04/21/07 (4)

No Pat D You're Wrong As Usual... - thetubeguy1954 08:43:46 04/23/07 (0)

Re: So, who are you guys to decide what people "should aspire to?" - beermanpete@socal.rr.com 23:20:37 04/21/07 (1)

Who are you to decide what is "best" for people? (nt) - Pat D 03:43:10 04/22/07 (0)

That would be consumers - Analog Scott 20:33:36 04/21/07 (0)

What are you adjusting? - clifff 07:15:01 04/20/07 (1)

My Response Albeit Tardy - thetubeguy1954 13:09:39 04/24/07 (0)

When is Accurate Musical Recording the goal ? - tomservo 15:04:06 04/19/07 (2)

Re: When is Accurate Musical Recording the goal ? - thetubeguy1954 08:40:09 04/20/07 (0)

Re: When is Accurate Musical Recording the goal ? - unclestu52 20:04:36 04/19/07 (0)

Technical vs. psychoacoustic accuracy - Pat D 14:18:17 04/19/07 (26)

Re: Technical vs. psychoacoustic accuracy - morricab 14:12:44 04/21/07 (1)

No such thing as accuracy... - mkuller 12:00:40 04/23/07 (0)

My $0.02..... - Todd Krieger 12:20:31 04/20/07 (1)

Re: My $0.02..... - Pat D 20:14:09 04/20/07 (0)

Isn't the amplifier - E-Stat 14:43:02 04/19/07 (21)

Re: Isn't the amplifier - Pat D 14:59:39 04/19/07 (20)

Amplifier accuracy... - mkuller 10:22:55 04/20/07 (10)

Insufficient data. (nt) - Pat D 10:25:28 04/20/07 (9)

Ahh, that's the slippery PatD we're used to... - mkuller 10:27:54 04/20/07 (8)

In your example, amps with 3% and 5% distortion ain't accurate. (nt) - Pat D 19:33:59 04/20/07 (5)

It was merely.... - mkuller 10:32:33 04/21/07 (4)

On your changed question, again, insufficient data. - Pat D 10:57:20 04/21/07 (3)

Exactly my point... - mkuller 10:08:25 04/23/07 (1)

Not really. - Pat D 16:30:43 04/23/07 (0)

Amplifying or Clarifying A Question Is Changing It To Pat D (nt) - thetubeguy1954 09:05:06 04/23/07 (0)

Found his teflon pills (nt) - E-Stat 11:23:14 04/20/07 (0)

How True... - thetubeguy1954 10:47:39 04/20/07 (0)

I am at once agog, baffled, befuddled, surprised, and utterly amazed !!! - E-Stat 15:44:23 04/19/07 (8)

Re: I am at once agog, baffled, befuddled, surprised, and utterly amazed !!! - thetubeguy1954 09:37:20 04/20/07 (7)

Re: I am at once agog, baffled, befuddled, surprised, and utterly amazed !!! - Pat D 10:22:39 04/20/07 (6)

Dang! - kerr 11:43:58 04/20/07 (0)

Teflon Pat D Is Back Tracking From What He's Said Yet Once Again! - thetubeguy1954 11:34:39 04/20/07 (4)

The answers are pretty simple: why do you avoid them? - Pat D 15:01:17 04/20/07 (3)

Pat D The Teflon King Continues To Avoid Answering 2 Simple Questions... - thetubeguy1954 17:37:46 04/20/07 (2)

Which questions am I supposed to take from your rambling posts? - Pat D 20:04:14 04/20/07 (1)

More Teflon Responses From Slippery Pat D - thetubeguy1954 08:57:42 04/23/07 (0)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - Analog Scott 12:35:07 04/19/07 (21)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 00:59:39 04/20/07 (20)

binaural recording comments - tunenut 09:55:57 04/21/07 (1)

Re: binaural recording comments - andy19191 12:15:22 04/21/07 (0)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - Analog Scott 10:17:25 04/20/07 (17)

Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 10:27:10 04/20/07 (16)

That's funny - Analog Scott 11:45:00 04/20/07 (14)

Re: That's funny - andy19191 22:16:24 04/20/07 (11)

Am I confident in my source? - Analog Scott 16:24:15 04/21/07 (0)

How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - E-Stat 07:49:49 04/21/07 (3)

Re: How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - Pat D 13:25:21 04/22/07 (2)

Right, different miking. Didn't I say that earlier? Yes, I did. (nt) - E-Stat 13:39:43 04/22/07 (1)

Also different playback. - Pat D 18:22:13 04/22/07 (0)

Re: That's funny - Pat D 06:43:24 04/21/07 (5)

It is merely stereo - Analog Scott 12:19:32 04/21/07 (4)

Wouldn't stereo be a subset of binaural? ( nt) - Pat D 13:16:34 04/22/07 (3)

No - Analog Scott 14:27:19 04/22/07 (2)

But our hearing is binaural. - Pat D 18:29:20 04/22/07 (0)

Exactly (nt) - E-Stat 16:18:33 04/22/07 (0)

So you look in a dictionary for a technical term??? - Pat D 13:49:44 04/20/07 (1)

He said look it up and I did. - Analog Scott 14:47:29 04/20/07 (0)

So how many ears do you have Andy? - E-Stat 11:09:03 04/20/07 (0)

A player paino. nt - Analog Scott 12:23:25 04/19/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Ahh, that's the slippery PatD we're used to... - mkuller 10:27:54 04/20/07 (8)

In your example, amps with 3% and 5% distortion ain't accurate. (nt) - Pat D 19:33:59 04/20/07 (5)

It was merely.... - mkuller 10:32:33 04/21/07 (4)

On your changed question, again, insufficient data. - Pat D 10:57:20 04/21/07 (3)

Exactly my point... - mkuller 10:08:25 04/23/07 (1)

Not really. - Pat D 16:30:43 04/23/07 (0)

Amplifying or Clarifying A Question Is Changing It To Pat D (nt) - thetubeguy1954 09:05:06 04/23/07 (0)

Found his teflon pills (nt) - E-Stat 11:23:14 04/20/07 (0)

How True... - thetubeguy1954 10:47:39 04/20/07 (0)

Post a Message!