In Reply to: Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? posted by Analog Scott on April 20, 2007 at 10:17:25:
> Binaural is just two channel stereophonic playback. The differences
> are very much a matter of detail. The basic approach is exactly the
> same.Can I suggest you count your ears and then look up binaural recording on the web. It is quite different from stereo.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 10:27:10 04/20/07 (16)
- That's funny - Analog Scott 11:45:00 04/20/07 (14)
- Re: That's funny - andy19191 22:16:24 04/20/07 (11)
- Am I confident in my source? - Analog Scott 16:24:15 04/21/07 (0)
- How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - E-Stat 07:49:49 04/21/07 (3)
- Re: How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - Pat D 13:25:21 04/22/07 (2)
- Right, different miking. Didn't I say that earlier? Yes, I did. (nt) - E-Stat 13:39:43 04/22/07 (1)
- Also different playback. - Pat D 18:22:13 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: That's funny - Pat D 06:43:24 04/21/07 (5)
- It is merely stereo - Analog Scott 12:19:32 04/21/07 (4)
- Wouldn't stereo be a subset of binaural? ( nt) - Pat D 13:16:34 04/22/07 (3)
- No - Analog Scott 14:27:19 04/22/07 (2)
- But our hearing is binaural. - Pat D 18:29:20 04/22/07 (0)
- Exactly (nt) - E-Stat 16:18:33 04/22/07 (0)
- So you look in a dictionary for a technical term??? - Pat D 13:49:44 04/20/07 (1)
- He said look it up and I did. - Analog Scott 14:47:29 04/20/07 (0)
- So how many ears do you have Andy? - E-Stat 11:09:03 04/20/07 (0)