In Reply to: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? posted by thetubeguy1954 on April 19, 2007 at 12:10:31:
>>Many would describe accurate reproduction as being the amplifier who's signal output most closely replicates a microphones signal output of the music being recorded. Many others would describe accurate reproduction as being the amplifier who's output most closely replicates a musical instrument's acoustic output of the music being recorded.Why does this great divide exist between these two differing beliefs?<<
Because both sides are confused by the huge and substantial difference between "reproduction" and the"illusion of reproduction froma single fixed perspective." Note that you are discussing the amplifier's output and whether it "closely replicates a musical instrument's output" That is just the thing. The "output" of the musical instruments is not being replicated at any point in the chain of recording or playback. It is being picked up at certain fixed points by transducers with certain characterisitics as chosen by a recording engineer. The idea that the signal generated from the mics is in anyway going to translate into any sort of *reproduction* of *The original acoustic event* is laughable. It's like taking a snap shot of a landscape and thinging the print is going to be an actual place.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - Analog Scott 12:35:07 04/19/07 (21)
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 00:59:39 04/20/07 (20)
- binaural recording comments - tunenut 09:55:57 04/21/07 (1)
- Re: binaural recording comments - andy19191 12:15:22 04/21/07 (0)
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - Analog Scott 10:17:25 04/20/07 (17)
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 10:27:10 04/20/07 (16)
- That's funny - Analog Scott 11:45:00 04/20/07 (14)
- Re: That's funny - andy19191 22:16:24 04/20/07 (11)
- Am I confident in my source? - Analog Scott 16:24:15 04/21/07 (0)
- How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - E-Stat 07:49:49 04/21/07 (3)
- Re: How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - Pat D 13:25:21 04/22/07 (2)
- Right, different miking. Didn't I say that earlier? Yes, I did. (nt) - E-Stat 13:39:43 04/22/07 (1)
- Also different playback. - Pat D 18:22:13 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: That's funny - Pat D 06:43:24 04/21/07 (5)
- It is merely stereo - Analog Scott 12:19:32 04/21/07 (4)
- Wouldn't stereo be a subset of binaural? ( nt) - Pat D 13:16:34 04/22/07 (3)
- No - Analog Scott 14:27:19 04/22/07 (2)
- But our hearing is binaural. - Pat D 18:29:20 04/22/07 (0)
- Exactly (nt) - E-Stat 16:18:33 04/22/07 (0)
- So you look in a dictionary for a technical term??? - Pat D 13:49:44 04/20/07 (1)
- He said look it up and I did. - Analog Scott 14:47:29 04/20/07 (0)
- So how many ears do you have Andy? - E-Stat 11:09:03 04/20/07 (0)