In Reply to: Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? posted by Analog Scott on April 19, 2007 at 12:35:07:
> The idea that the signal generated from the mics is in anyway going to
> translate into any sort of *reproduction* of *The original acoustic
> event* is laughable.No. The brain is very good at filling in missing information so long as the cues are correct.
Proper multichannel recordings played back over loudspeakers are a substantial step towards "being there" type accuracy compared to stereo recordings. Accurate binaural recordings are an even bigger step. Both these involve straightforward established knowledge and fairly cheap hardware compared with the typical prices of audiophile hardware.
The only problem seems to be that nobody appears to believe that there is a market for high sound quality outside a small number of professional and research areas. The audiophile market has never demonstrated any interest in accurate sound reproduction in a real rather than marketed sense. The most clear example of this is probably what companies opted to do with new media like SACD and DVD-Audio.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 00:59:39 04/20/07 (20)
- binaural recording comments - tunenut 09:55:57 04/21/07 (1)
- Re: binaural recording comments - andy19191 12:15:22 04/21/07 (0)
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - Analog Scott 10:17:25 04/20/07 (17)
- Re: What Constitutes Accurate Musical Replication? - andy19191 10:27:10 04/20/07 (16)
- That's funny - Analog Scott 11:45:00 04/20/07 (14)
- Re: That's funny - andy19191 22:16:24 04/20/07 (11)
- Am I confident in my source? - Analog Scott 16:24:15 04/21/07 (0)
- How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - E-Stat 07:49:49 04/21/07 (3)
- Re: How many channels do YOU think are found in binaural? - Pat D 13:25:21 04/22/07 (2)
- Right, different miking. Didn't I say that earlier? Yes, I did. (nt) - E-Stat 13:39:43 04/22/07 (1)
- Also different playback. - Pat D 18:22:13 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: That's funny - Pat D 06:43:24 04/21/07 (5)
- It is merely stereo - Analog Scott 12:19:32 04/21/07 (4)
- Wouldn't stereo be a subset of binaural? ( nt) - Pat D 13:16:34 04/22/07 (3)
- No - Analog Scott 14:27:19 04/22/07 (2)
- But our hearing is binaural. - Pat D 18:29:20 04/22/07 (0)
- Exactly (nt) - E-Stat 16:18:33 04/22/07 (0)
- So you look in a dictionary for a technical term??? - Pat D 13:49:44 04/20/07 (1)
- He said look it up and I did. - Analog Scott 14:47:29 04/20/07 (0)
- So how many ears do you have Andy? - E-Stat 11:09:03 04/20/07 (0)