In Reply to: Technical vs. psychoacoustic accuracy posted by Pat D on April 19, 2007 at 14:18:17:
part of the "signal processing" of the system?I won't bother asking what a "suitable amp" is. ;)
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Isn't the amplifier - E-Stat 14:43:02 04/19/07 (21)
- Re: Isn't the amplifier - Pat D 14:59:39 04/19/07 (20)
- Amplifier accuracy... - mkuller 10:22:55 04/20/07 (10)
- Insufficient data. (nt) - Pat D 10:25:28 04/20/07 (9)
- Ahh, that's the slippery PatD we're used to... - mkuller 10:27:54 04/20/07 (8)
- In your example, amps with 3% and 5% distortion ain't accurate. (nt) - Pat D 19:33:59 04/20/07 (5)
- It was merely.... - mkuller 10:32:33 04/21/07 (4)
- On your changed question, again, insufficient data. - Pat D 10:57:20 04/21/07 (3)
- Exactly my point... - mkuller 10:08:25 04/23/07 (1)
- Not really. - Pat D 16:30:43 04/23/07 (0)
- Amplifying or Clarifying A Question Is Changing It To Pat D (nt) - thetubeguy1954 09:05:06 04/23/07 (0)
- Found his teflon pills (nt) - E-Stat 11:23:14 04/20/07 (0)
- How True... - thetubeguy1954 10:47:39 04/20/07 (0)
- I am at once agog, baffled, befuddled, surprised, and utterly amazed !!! - E-Stat 15:44:23 04/19/07 (8)
- Re: I am at once agog, baffled, befuddled, surprised, and utterly amazed !!! - thetubeguy1954 09:37:20 04/20/07 (7)
- Re: I am at once agog, baffled, befuddled, surprised, and utterly amazed !!! - Pat D 10:22:39 04/20/07 (6)
- Dang! - kerr 11:43:58 04/20/07 (0)
- Teflon Pat D Is Back Tracking From What He's Said Yet Once Again! - thetubeguy1954 11:34:39 04/20/07 (4)
- The answers are pretty simple: why do you avoid them? - Pat D 15:01:17 04/20/07 (3)
- Pat D The Teflon King Continues To Avoid Answering 2 Simple Questions... - thetubeguy1954 17:37:46 04/20/07 (2)
- Which questions am I supposed to take from your rambling posts? - Pat D 20:04:14 04/20/07 (1)
- More Teflon Responses From Slippery Pat D - thetubeguy1954 08:57:42 04/23/07 (0)