In Reply to: Re: For The Record.... posted by andy19191 on October 30, 2006 at 00:51:24:
Ah... you, like Aczel, are confusing "beliefs" with "experiences". I thought so.>Why do you need to take him seriously? Surely all that matters is the arguments he puts forward.<
Fine. It's hard to take his arguments seriously. He comes off as a guy who either a) is hard of hearing, b) has listening deficiences, c) overuses poetic license and/or d) has a serious axe to grind with the industry that blew the whistle on the Fourier escapade. And that IS based on his arguments. He obviously does not listen to audio components and this was brought out on at least one of his rave reviews. It was based solely on specs, things that you yourself said were merely tools rather than a sole predictor. A lot of his "lies" I have experienced first hand and others have been experienced by others whose ears and judgment I trust.
>Again you are pretending to confuse preference with what is established scientifically. Why are you this desperate?<
I'm just going with what is in the article. You may want to ask Aczel that question. Maybe he'll answer you. It is, after all, HIS article.
>Perhaps we could add to the list your examining why you are sinking to this level of hopeless argument to support the audiophile cause<
What argument is that? Experiences? Odd that you would say so. May I ask how you determine the quality of a sound system?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: For The Record.... - kerr 09:42:22 11/02/06 (1)
- Re: For The Record.... - andy19191 13:11:45 11/02/06 (0)