In Reply to: Re: Well, yes, but .... posted by jneutron on June 12, 2006 at 08:59:51:
Actually, nobody's found a sensitivity lower than 5-6 microseconds, so no, it's a pretty hard floor to present, especially given that that time can also be related directly to the noise limits of the neural firing rate, etc.ITD vs angle is not uniform, but the data still shows that the 5-6 microsecond dl seems to hold at the best points of sensitivity.
Now, signal dependent delay is also easily looked at as IM distortion, if you think about it, it's phase modulation, which creates distortion, eh?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well, no... - real_jj 12:35:37 06/13/06 (11)
- Re: Well, no... - jneutron 13:51:11 06/13/06 (10)
- phase distortion - real_jj 20:10:02 06/13/06 (9)
- Re: phase distortion - jneutron 06:25:15 06/14/06 (8)
- Well, actually, a fourier transform HAS to be able to detect them all... - real_jj 19:11:39 06/14/06 (7)
- Re: Well, actually, a fourier transform HAS to be able to detect them all... - jneutron 13:08:47 06/15/06 (6)
- Ahh, I see what you mean... there's a math error. - real_jj 13:41:14 06/15/06 (5)
- Re: Ahh, I see what you mean... there's a math error. - jneutron 14:02:41 06/15/06 (4)
- Yes, but you're missing the point.... - real_jj 14:30:30 06/15/06 (3)
- Actually, it's far more interesting than that - jneutron 06:23:52 06/16/06 (2)
- Well, I can only suggest that you look at each waveform in a simulation... - real_jj 14:22:56 06/16/06 (1)
- been there, done that. - jneutron 05:49:18 06/19/06 (0)