In Reply to: I already did. Didn't you read the thread before coming up with irrelevant ad hominem allegation? (nt) posted by Pat D on June 5, 2006 at 20:06:33:
With my current main speakers, which I have only had for a couple of weeks, I have only used the present configuration...Remembering saying this? I was suggesting you try comparing the "present configuration" with another one not mixing gauges and lengths.
The conclusion of yours I referred to is:
"Not being an expert in the matter, my thought on differential localization is that this is stereo, not a real object..." [for some reason, standard HTML tags for bold and italic don't work on this text]
Does that mean differential localization is only valid with objects?
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I read your exact words. Is that the problem? - E-Stat 10:06:31 06/06/06 (34)
- Why should I wire my system to satisfy you? - Pat D 12:50:27 06/06/06 (33)
- No reason at all - E-Stat 13:36:53 06/06/06 (5)
- Hold your head in a vise? - E-Stat 20:26:34 06/08/06 (3)
- Re: Hold your head in a vise? - Pat D 05:37:10 06/09/06 (0)
- The Asylum had a big brain fart today... I noticed about 20 blank posts in the fora I follow. [nt] - Ted Smith 20:32:02 06/08/06 (1)
- I saw posts in other forums as well (nt) - E-Stat 06:28:35 06/09/06 (0)
- So you want me to hold my head in a vice? - Pat D 09:20:41 06/08/06 (0)
- Timing in wire????? - real_jj 13:22:28 06/06/06 (26)
- Re: Timing in wire????? - jneutron 13:39:52 06/06/06 (25)
- Re: Timing in wire????? - andy_c 16:34:51 06/06/06 (3)
- Re: Timing in wire????? - jneutron 06:17:27 06/07/06 (2)
- Reference for LTRA - andy_c 10:16:51 06/07/06 (1)
- Re: Reference for LTRA - jneutron 11:13:59 06/07/06 (0)
- That's probably more significant... - real_jj 14:11:31 06/06/06 (20)
- Transmission lines....he he...hmmm - jneutron 06:09:29 06/07/06 (16)
- Well, yes, but .... - real_jj 12:54:22 06/09/06 (13)
- Re: Well, yes, but .... - jneutron 08:59:51 06/12/06 (12)
- Well, no... - real_jj 12:35:37 06/13/06 (11)
- Re: Well, no... - jneutron 13:51:11 06/13/06 (10)
- phase distortion - real_jj 20:10:02 06/13/06 (9)
- Re: phase distortion - jneutron 06:25:15 06/14/06 (8)
- Well, actually, a fourier transform HAS to be able to detect them all... - real_jj 19:11:39 06/14/06 (7)
- Re: Well, actually, a fourier transform HAS to be able to detect them all... - jneutron 13:08:47 06/15/06 (6)
- Ahh, I see what you mean... there's a math error. - real_jj 13:41:14 06/15/06 (5)
- Re: Ahh, I see what you mean... there's a math error. - jneutron 14:02:41 06/15/06 (4)
- Yes, but you're missing the point.... - real_jj 14:30:30 06/15/06 (3)
- Actually, it's far more interesting than that - jneutron 06:23:52 06/16/06 (2)
- Well, I can only suggest that you look at each waveform in a simulation... - real_jj 14:22:56 06/16/06 (1)
- been there, done that. - jneutron 05:49:18 06/19/06 (0)
- You a power engineer??? - real_jj 11:00:21 06/09/06 (1)
- relatively speaking. - jneutron 08:22:03 06/12/06 (0)
- Does that mean I have to hold my head in a vise? - Pat D 17:25:59 06/06/06 (2)
- Only if it's a very, very accurate, rigid vice. :) - real_jj 18:28:13 06/06/06 (1)
- Re: Only if it's a very, very accurate, rigid vice. :) - Pat D 15:21:30 06/10/06 (0)